Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The Current Status of Foodservice Management in the Restaurants Participating in the Government-funded Children's Model Program in Korea during Summer Vacation

The Current Status of Foodservice Management in the Restaurants Participating in the Government-funded Children's Model Program in Korea during Summer Vacation

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2012;17(2):182-193
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 April 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.2.182
1Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
2Geumcheon-gu Center for Child-care Foodservice Management, Seoul, Korea.
3Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Jihyun Yoon, Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea. Tel: (02) 880-8750, Fax: (02) 884-0305, hoonyoon@snu.ac.kr
Received 2011 December 31; Revised 2012 February 24; Accepted 2012 March 07.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of food service management in the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program during summer vacation. A mail survey was conducted with individuals who worked in the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program in Seoul during the summer vacation in 2010. A total of 600 questionnaires were distributed to 274 Chinese, 235 Bunsik and 91 Korean restaurants, which were selected using proportionate stratified sampling by regions and types of operations. A total of 138 usable questionnaires (23.0%) were returned and analyzed. The results showed that over half (57.2%) of the restaurants did not employ any certified cooks. Most of the restaurants (97.8%) provided side dishes; among them, only 42% planned menus for side dishes in advance and only a half changed side dish menus periodically. The suggested reasonable reimbursement rate per meal for children using restaurants differed by types of restaurants; the percentage of restaurants having responded 5,000 won or higher was the highest in Chinese restaurants. This study revealed that food service in the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program was not properly managed during summer vacation, especially in terms of menu and food production. This study also showed that the suggested reasonable reimbursement rate of meals for children using restaurants differed by types of restaurants, implying that adjusting the reimbursement rate according to types of restaurants should be considered in the government-funded children's meal program.

Notes

This research was supported by a grant (10062 Sikpuman 035) from Korea Food and Drug Administration in 2010.

References

1. Bae EJ, Kwon JH, Yoon HJ, Lee SK. Nutritional status of school lunch supported students in an elementary school. J Korean Diet Assoc 2001. 7(4)349–360.
2. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ. The effects of poverty on children. Future Child 1997. 7(2)55–71.
3. Choi HL. Government-funded meal through convenience stores: current status and nutritional quality of available meal items 2010. Seoul National University; 21. Master thesis.
4. Choi HL, Kwon S, Yoon J. Government-funded meal support program for low-income children through convenience stores : current status and nutritional quality of available meal items in seoul. Korean J Community Nutr 2011. 16(2)253–264.
5. The concerns about China-made food. Chosunilbo 2008. cited 2011 December 21. Available from http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2008/09/29/2008092901795.html.
6. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method 2007. 2nd edth ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.;
7. Information about certified cook. Human Resources Development Service of Korea 2011. cited 2011 December 21. Available from http://www.q-net.or.kr.
8. Kim ES. A study on improving the efficiency of the free feeding system for poorly-fed children in Gangwon province 2007a. Gangwon: Gangwon Development Research Institute; 180–184.
9. Kim MS. Status on foodservice program for low-income children 2007b. National Human Rights Commission of Korea;
10. Outbreak of food borne diseases in 2010, Seoul, Korea. Korea Food and Drug Administration 2011. cited 2011 December 23. Available from http://estat.kfda.go.kr.
11. A survey on the current status of children. Korea National Statistical Office 2011. cited 2011 December 17. Available from http://www.kosis.kr.
12. Korean Standard Industrial Classification. Korean Standard Industrial Classification 2010. cited 2010 August 21. Available from http://kostat.go.kr.
13. Kwon S. Development and evaluation of the support model for foodservice management of community child centers in Korea 2011. Seoul National University; 25–57. Dissertation.
14. Lee HH. A study on support policies for undernourished children during vacation. J Adolesc Welf 2006. 8(2)159–176.
15. Lee HW. An evaluation of the lunch programs for the children in need: comparision of the patrents' program satisfaction among the three types of institutions. J Korean Soc Child Welf 1999. 879–102.
16. Lee KH, Lyu ES, Lee KY. A study on the sanitary status at various types of restaurants in Changwon city. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2001. 30747–759.
17. Li S, Paik HY, Hong KE, Joung HJ. Comparison of dietary intakes and body composition by Tanner stages in Korean girls. Korean J Nutr 2004. 37(7)566–575.
18. Lim YH, Kwak HO. A study on the sanitary management practices of institutional foodservice employees in Daejeon and Chungnam area. Korean J Food Cult 2006. 21(4)381–387.
19. Enforcement rule of the school meals act. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology[MEST] 2007. cited 2011 December 23. Available from http://likms.assembly.go.kr.
20. Eat absentmindedly? No! Healthy food is a privilege for the children. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW] 2009a. cited 2012 January 25. Available from http://www.mw.go.kr.
21. Enforcement rule of food sanitation act. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW] 2009b. cited 2011 December 23. Available from http://likms.assembly.go.kr.
22. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW]. 2010 Statistics about child foodservice program 2010. 07. Unpublished raw data.
23. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW]. 2011 The child foodservice program guide 2011a. 33–46.
24. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW]. 2011 The child foodservice program guide 2011b. 59–61.
25. Enforcement decree of food sanitation act. Ministry of Health and Welfare[MHW] 2011c. cited 2011 December 23. Available from http://likms.assembly.go.kr.
26. Park HS, Ahn SH. Eating habits and social behavior in Korean preschool children. Korean J Nutr 2003. 36(3)298–305.
27. Park JJ, Moon GP. An empirical study on the effects of national technology certificate of cook on the self-efficacy and career development lifelong study performance: in the context of food industry. Korean J Tourism Res 2010. 25(5)409–433.
28. Park JY, Ahn SS, Park HH. A study on differences food hygiene knowledge and practice between houswives and the contract foodservice employees. Korean J Food Nutr 2006. 19(3)301–310.
29. Park ND. Analysis of the status of foodservice program for children from low-income families in Daejeon and improvement plan for the support system 2008. Daejeon: Deajeon Development Institute; 39–107.
30. Park YH, Lee YK. Analysis of sanitation management practices through field assessment of large restaurants by restaurant style in Daegu and Gyeongbuk province. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2007. 36(7)944–954.
31. Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2011-2012 Measures of the supporting to the child foodservice program 2011.
32. Shim JE, Yoon J, Lee K, Kwon S. Evaluation of dietary intake of Korean school-aged children from low-income families by comparing with the Korean food guide: Analysis of the data from the 2001 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Korean J Nutr 2009. 42(8)691–701.
33. SPSS Inc. PASW Statistics 18.0 2009. [Predictive analytics software].
34. Sung SJ, Kwon SJ. Effect of eating with family or alone on the self-rated mental or physical health: the elementary school children in Daejeon area. Korean J Community Nutr 2010. 15(2)206–226.
35. Um YH. A study on actual sanitary management conditions and education plan of school foodservice employees. Korean J Culinary Res 2010. 16(3)237–249.
36. Weaver CM. Adolescence: The period of dramatic bone growth. Endocrine 2002. 17(1)43–48.
37. Yoon B. Operation and menu evaluation of organizations delivering meal boxes for children from low-income families during summer vacation in Korea 2009. Seoul National University; 92–111. Master thesis.
38. Yoon B, Yoon J, Shim JE, Kwon S. The current of meal box service management for children from low-income families during summer vacation. Korean J Community Nutr 2009. 14(2)206–215.

Article information Continued

Table 1

General characteristics of the respondents and the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program

Table 1

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc.

2) n (%)

3) Others included manager and junior staff

4) Size of exclusively used space (1 pyeong = 3.3058 m2)

5) Certificate is issued by Human Resource Development Service of Korea

Table 2

The current status of the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program

Table 2

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc., 2) Mean ± SD, 3) by one-way ANOVA test, 4) multiple responses, 5) n (%), 6) by chi-square test, 7) included 'Meals are delivered even if one portion is ordered' and 'Home delivery requires to guarantee a minimum', 8) included 'Home delivery is not available for the children' and 'Home delivery is not available at all'

Table 3

Menu management of the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program

Table 3

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc., 2) by chi-square test, 3) when the cooking takes a long time such as yookgaejang, and kalbitang, 4) n (%), 5) when ordering main dishes such as soup, stew, fried rice, and bibimbap

Table 4

Food purchasing management of the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program

Table 4

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc., 2) by chi-square test, 3) n (%), 4) others included 'Discount store', 'Grocery store', and 'Privately farm'

Table 5

Food production management of the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program

Table 5

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc., 2) by chi-square test, 3) n (%), 4) others included 'No remaining food materials', 'Be at owners' disposal', 'Give away to neighbors', etc., 5) others included 'No leftovers', 'Give away to neighbors', etc.

Table 6

Performance of sanitation management of the restaurants participating in the government-funded children's meal program1)

Table 6

1) Likert scale: 1 point for strongly disagree, 2 points for disagree, 3 points for neutral, 4 points for agree, and 5 points for strongly agree

2) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc.

3) By one-way ANOVA test

4) Mean ± SD

a, b: Different superscripts mean significant differences at alpha = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 7

Respondents' opinions on the government-funded children's meal program

Table 7

1) It was operationalized as a restaurant mainly dealing with gimbap, tteokbokki, ramen, etc.

2) By chi-square test

3) n (%)

4) Likert scale: 1 point for strongly disagree, 2 points for disagree, 3 points for neutral, 4 points for agree, and 5 points for strongly agree

5) Mean ± SD

6) By one-way ANOVA test

a, b: Different superscripts mean significant differences at alpha = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test