Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Recognition and Propagation for Temple Food among University Students with Food-related Majors


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Recognition and Propagation for Temple Food among University Students with Food-related Majors

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2018;23(2):137-147
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 April 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2018.23.2.137
In-Joon Huh, Sim-Yeol Leeorcid_icon
Department of Home Economics Education, Graduate School of Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Sim-Yeol Lee. Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea. Tel: (02) 2260-3413, Fax: (02) 2265-1170, slee@dongguk.edu
Received 2018 April 06; Revised 2018 April 28; Accepted 2018 April 28.

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted to investigate the perspective and popularization of temple food among university students with food related majors, and to provide basic data for the popularization and the fostering of professional lecture in temple food.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was applied to 453 university students at six universities with food related majors. The questionnaire was designed to examine interest, recognition, consumption, popularization and curriculum of temple food.

Results

The study population consisted of 19.2% men, and 80.8% women, and the most common response to desired career after graduation was food related employment (53.9%). Overall, 49.0% replied that they had an interest in temple food, which was relatively low. 59.9% of respondents who had been known throw TV, Internet, newspaper, and magazines about temple food were showed the highest results. Additionally, as for the perception of temple food, ‘Prevention of lifestyle related disease’ was the highest score (4.10). Overall, 64.9% of the subjects had not tried temple food, and 84.7% of these responded that this was because they had not encountered temple food. Among subjects who had tried temple food, most had encountered it at a temple (73.0%), and 78.0% replied that the taste of temple food was suitable. The intention to try temple food was 73.3%, and 64.8% of respondents said there was a necessity to establishment curriculum regarding temple food. Finally, interest, popularization, and intention to try temple food were significantly positively corelated.

Conclusions

The results showed high interest in temple food and willingness to participate in education regarding temple food, as well as awareness of the need for popularization. Therefore, it is necessary to increase intake opportunities to raise interest in temple foods. This can be accomplished utilizing publicity materials, as well as by offering opportunities for temple food education through curriculum.

Keywords: Korean temple food; awareness; popularization; foodservice students

References

1. Shin DK, Jang BJ. A study of commercialization of traditional temple food for tourism. Tour Res 2004;2004:471–482.
2. Kang YE, Lee SY. Utilization of internet dietary information by university students in Seoul and Gyeonggi area. Korean J Hum Ecol 2016;25(6):811–821.
3. Lee SL, Lee SH. Survey on health-related factors, nutrition knowledge and food habits of college students in Wonju area. Korean J Community Nutr 2015;20(2):96–108.
4. Ko MS. The comparison in daily intake of nutrients, dietary habits and body composition of female college students by body mass index. Nutr Res Pract 2007;1(2):131–142.
5. Hong GJ, Lee YS, Nam JS, An HK, Lee EJ. A study on the preference determinants of Buddhist temple food. Korean J Food Nutr 2007;20(4):384–391.
6. Jeon HW. The effects on Sachaleumsik involvement of intention relation: moderating effects of perceived value. Korea Tour Res Assoc 2011;25(5):295–313.
7. Jeon HW, Cho SH, Lee MH. Effect of the characteristics of temple food on satisfaction: moderating effect of religion. Culi Sci Hosp Res 2013;19(4):40–55.
8. Jin YH, Cho JO. The effect of the next generation's recognition of traditional food on the popularization of foodservice industry. Culi Sci Hosp Res 2007;13(3):1–11.
9. Lee SY, Kim JA. A study on temple food intake and health. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2014;24(6):691–699.
10. Kim JA, Lee SY. Evaluation of served menu and management of foodservice in Korean Buddhist temples. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2006;16(2):215–225.
11. Lee SY, Kim JA. The development of institutional food-service menu with temple food. Korean J Community Nutr 2015;20(5):338–350.
12. Kwak JH, Hong KW. Influences of the quality of life and education satisfaction in the temple food course: focused on the participation motivation type. Korean J Tour Res 2016;31(4):231–247.
13. Cho MH. Research on the strategy to popularize the traditional Korean Zen cuisine [master's thesis] Sookmyong women's University; 2002.
14. Jang BJ. A exploratory study on the method for population and tourism commercialization of Korean traditional temple food. Northeast Asia Tour Res 2011;7(2):147–162.
15. Sung Y, Seo SY. Awareness of temple food for popularizing temple food preference and food research. Korea Acad Soc Tour Manag 2016;31(5):311–330.
16. Jeon HW, Cho SH, Lee MH. Effect of the characteristics of temple food on satisfaction: moderating effect of religion. Culi Sci Hosp Res 2013;19(4):40–55.
17. Kim JH, Hong KW. The effect of the selected attributes of Korean temple food on satisfaction and the repurchase intention. J Hotel Resort 2016;15(1):283–302.
18. Jin YH. A study on recognition of globalization of Korean food among the students majoring in foodservice. Culi Sci Hosp Res 2011;17(5):57–73.
19. Kim TH, Lee EJ, Lee EJ. A study on perception and globalization of Korean food among university students with food-related majors. Korean J Food Cult 2009;24(6):597–606.
20. Chung HJ. A study on the Korean food (Hansik) curriculum of culinary art & science related department: focus on the mainly four-year universities in Korea. Korean J Hum Ecol 2011;20(1):183–194.
21. Kang JH, Kim JE. A survey of the perception of the superior factors to of Korean traditional foods by college students with food related majors. Korean J Food Cult 2009;24(2):155–163.
22. Jin YH, Jo JO, Moon HY. A study on the effect of traditional food acceptability of college students with food majors in Seoul on menu development. Korean J Culi Res 2008;14(4):176–187.
23. Bae YH. A study of the popularization of temple food. East Asian Soc Buddhist Cult 2015;22:636–670.
24. Kang KK. A study on the current availability and popularization of the Korean Buddhist temple dish [master's thesis] Chodang University; 2010.
25. Son HJ. Satisfaction with and perception of the curricula of the educational institutions specialized in training professional cooks for the globalization of Korean food [master's thesis] Dongguk University; 2012.
26. Moon YS, Lee SY. A study on recognition, preference and popularization of temple food-among local and foreign restaurant visitors. Korean J Community Nutr 2017;22(1):53–62.
27. Jeon HY, Kim KS. The effect of satisfaction on the involvement of temple food. J Hotel Resort 2011;13(1):77–99.
28. Hwang EG, Kim SJ, Kim BG, Lee JY. Awareness analysis for popularization of temple food in monks. J Korean Data Inform Sci Soc 2015;26(6):1217–1224.
29. Hwang EG, Ann YG, Kim BK. A survey analysis of perception about popularization for temple food based on consumer. Korean J Food Nutr 2017;30(1):67–73.
30. Jang SC, Ha JY. The influence of cultural experience: emotions in relation to authenticity at ethnic restaurants. J Foodserv Bus Res 2015;18(3):287–306.
31. Park ES. Factors of food adaptation and changes of food habit on Korean residing in America. Korean J Diet Cult 1997;12(5):519–529.
32. Byun KS, Cho YD, Kim CS. Opening of education program in the culinary related departments and 2012 curriculum development of the division of food service & hotel culinary industry. Korea Acad Soc Tour Manag 2012;27(4):271–296.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
The Korean Society of Community Nutrition

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Table 1

General characteristics of respondents

Table 1

1) N (%)

2) **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001

Table 2

The interest in temple food according to the gender

Table 2

1) N (%)

2) Mean ± SD

3) Scale: 1=Strongly little, 2=Little, 3=Neutral, 4=Much, 5=Strongly much

4) Respondents who had been interested in temple food

Table 3

The difference in perception of temple food according to the gender

Table 3

1) Mean ± SD

2) Scale: 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree

Table 4

The difference in state of intake of temple food according to the gender

Table 4

1) N (%)

2) Respondents who had been intake temple food

Table 5

The condition of popularization and necessity in temple food according to the gender

Table 5

1) N (%)

2) Mean ± SD

3) Scale: 1=Strongly unnecessary, 2=Unnecessary, 3=Neutral, 4=Necessary, 5=Strongly necessary

4) Scale: 1=Not very well done, 2=Not progress well, 3=Average, 4=Progress well, 5=Very well done

5) *: p<0.05

Table 6

The factors of popularization in temple food according to the gender

Table 6

1) Mean ± SD

2) Scale: 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree

3) *: p<0.05

Table 7

The necessity of establishing curriculum in temple food according to gender

Table 7

1) N (%)

2) Mean ± SD

3) Scale: 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly Agree

4) Scale: 1=Strongly unnecessary, 2=Unnecessary, 3=Neutral, 4=Necessary, 5=Strongly necessary

5) *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01

Table 8

The correlation among temple food interest, necessity of popularization, intention of education

Table 8

1) ***: p<0.001 by Pearson's correlation coefficient