Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-09.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Association between Preferences of Salty Food and Acuity and Preferences of Taste of the Elderly People Living in Rural Area

Association between Preferences of Salty Food and Acuity and Preferences of Taste of the Elderly People Living in Rural Area

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2013;18(3):223-232
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.3.223
Department of Food and Nutrition, Hannam University, Daejeon, Korea.
Corresponding author: Mee Sook Lee, Department of Food and Nutrition, Hannam University, #461-6 Jeonmin-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-811, Korea. Tel: (042) 629-8794, Fax: (042) 629-8789, meesook@hnu.kr
Received 2013 March 28; Revised 2013 May 14; Accepted 2013 May 14.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of salt (NaCl) recognition threshold and pleasant salt concentrations of Korean rural elderly subjects on preference of salty food as well as food group consumption patterns. The subjects were 213 elderly people (male 71 and female 142) over 65 and under 90 yr of age from Sunchang area. The higher values were found with male subjects in the areas of basic taste recognition threshold and pleasant concentration level of salt. The taste sensitivity scores of male subjects did not decrease with the increasing age, but female subjects exhibited a significant decrease with the age. The major determinant factor of salt preference of the elderly subjects in this study appeared to be personal pleasant concentration of salt rather than salt recognition threshold level and this trend was more evident in males than in females. The subject group of lower salt pleasant concentration i.e. consuming less salt showed the higher number of fruit and fruit juice intakes per week, and higher MNA (define this) scores were implying that they display more desirable nutritional status. Therefore, nutritional education focused on not only a variety of food consumption but also lowering pleasant salt concentration levels is advised to improve the quality of nutrition in the elderly.

Notes

This work was supported by the 2012 Hannam University Research Fund.

References

1. Baker KA, Didcock EA, Kemm JR, Patrick JM. Effect of age, sex and illness on salt taste detection thresholds. Age Ageing 1983;12:159–165.
2. Bartoshuk LM. Clinical psychophysics of taste. Gerodontics 1988;4:249–255.
3. Bartoshuk LM, Rifkin B, Marks LE, Bars P. Taste and aging. J Gerontol 1986;41(1):51–57.
4. Blais CA, Pangborn RM, Borhani NO, Ferrell MF, Prineas RJ. Effect of dietary sodium restriction on taste responses to sodium chloride: a longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;44:232–243.
5. Booth P, Kohrs MB, Kamath S. Taste acuity and aging: a review. Nutr Res 1982;2:95–109.
6. Brown JE. Nutrition through the life cycle 4th edth ed. USA: Wadsworth; 2008. p. 466.
7. Chung BS, Kang KO, Lee JK. Studies on the taste sensitivity and eating habits of Koreans. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 1984;13(1):86–96.
8. Chyun JH, Woo KJ, Chung KS. Taste preference and taste perception of Korean elderly. J Korean Home Econ Assoc 1994;32(5):143–151.
9. De Jong N, Mulder I, de Graaf C, van Straveren WA. Impaired sensory functioning in elders: the relation with its potential determinants and nutritional intake. J Gerontol 1999;54(8):B324–B331.
10. Drewnowski A, Shultz JM. Impact of aging on eating behaviors, food choices, nutrition, and health status. J Nutr Health Aging 2001;5(2):75–79.
11. Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1424–1435.
12. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Driscoll A, Rolls BJ. Salt taste perceptions and preferences are unrelated to sodium consumption in healthy older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:471–474.
13. Durack E, Alonso-Gomez M, Wilkinson MG. Salt: a review of its role in food science and public health. Curr Nutr Food Sci 2008;4:290–297.
14. Finkelstein JA, Schiffman SS. Workshop on taste and smell in the elderly: an overview. Physiol Behav 1999;66(2):173–176.
15. Fukunaga A, Uematsu H, Sugimoto K. Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J Gerontol Med Sci 2005;60A(1):109–113.
16. Hofmann T, Ho CT, Pickenhagen W. Challenges in taste research: present knowledge and future implications. American Chemical Society. Challenges in taste chemistry and biology. ACS symposium series 867 Washington DC: ACS; 2004. p. 13–14.
17. IMSC (The Italian Multicentric Study on Centenarians). Assessment of sense of taste in Italian centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1998;26:177–183.
18. KFDA (Korea Food & Drug Administration). Information of Na cited 2013 March 8. 2012. Available from: http://www.foodnara.go.kr/Na_down/res/contents/natrium4.jsp.
19. Kim GH, Hwang JH, Song KH, Kim MJ, Lee HM. The factors affecting sweet taste sensitivity and preference of the Korean middle-aged females. J Community Nutr 2006;8(2):107–113.
20. Kim HH, Jung YY, Lee YK. A comparison of salty taste assessments and dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors associated with high-salt diets in four regions in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2012;17(1):38–48.
21. Kim KS, Paik HY. A comparative study on optimum gustation of salt and sodium intake in young and middle-aged Korean women. Korean J Nutr 1992;25(1):32–41.
22. Koo NS. Taste sensitivity and changes in taste intensity with the addition of MSG. Korean J Hum Ecol 1998;7(1):197–203.
23. Kremer S, Bult JHF, Mojet J, Kroeze HA. Food perception with age and its relationship to pleasantness. Chem Senses 2007;32(6):591–602.
24. Lee HM. Effects of lifestyles, dietary habits, food preferences and nutrient intakes on sensitivity to and preference for saltytastes of Korean women. J Community Nutr 2006;8(4):185–192.
25. Lee MS. Dietary behavior factors for desirable nutrient intakes of the oldest-old population in Sunchang county. Korean J Community Nutr 2009;14(6):699–709.
26. Lee MS. Taste perceptions of middle-aged and elderly people living in rural areas: relationships among threshold, taste preference and physical activity. Korean J Community Nutr 2010;15(5):670–678.
27. Lee MS, Kim SA. The influence of health-related habits on nutrient intake and food frequency of middle-aged subjects in Seoul. Korean J Community Nutr 2003;8(5):699–707.
28. Lee MS, Woo MK. A study on the factors influencing food consumption by food frequency questionnaire for the middle aged and elderly in the Chonju area. Korean J Community Nutr 2001;6(5):789–797.
29. Lucas L, Riddell L, Liem G, Whitelock S, Keast R. The influence of sodium on liking and consumption of salty food. J Food Sci 2011;76:S72–S76.
30. Mattes RD. The chemical senses and nutrition in aging: challenging old assumptions. J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102(2):192–196.
31. Mitchell M, Brunton NP, Wilkinson MG. The influence of salt taste threshold on acceptability and purchase intent of reformulated reduced sodium vegetable soups. Food Qual Prefer 2013;28:356–360.
32. Mojet J, Christ-Hazelhof E, Heidema J. Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basic tastes? Chem Senses 2001;26:845–860.
33. Mojet J, Christ-Hazelhof E, Heidema J. Taste perception with age: pleasantness and its relationships with threshold sensitivity and supra-threshold intensity of five taste qualities. Food Qual Prefer 2005;16:413–423.
34. Mojet J, Heidema J, Christ-Hazelhof E. Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in supra-threshold intensities of five taste qualities? Chem Senses 2003;28:397–413.
35. Murphy C. Aging and chemosensory perception of and preference for nutritionally significant stimuli. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989;561:251–266.
36. Murphy C. Nutrition and chemosensory perception in the elderly. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1993;33(1):3–15.
37. Murphy C, Withee J. Age-related differences in the pleasantness of chemosensory stimuli. Psychol Aging 1986;1:312–318.
38. Pingel J, Ostwald J, Pau HW, Hummel T, Just T. Normative data for a solution-based taste test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;DOI 10.1007/s00405-010-1276-1.
39. Receputo G, Mazzoleni G, Di Fazio I, Alessandria I, Savia S, Scarpinato RA, Tomasello FB, Laurino A, Fornard D. Study on the sense of taste in a group of Sicilian centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1996;22Suppl 1. :411–414.
40. Schiffman SS. Perception of taste and smell in elderly persons. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1993;33:17–26.
41. Schiffman SS. Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. JAMA 1997;278(16):1357–1362.
42. Schiffman SS. Critical illness and changes in sensory perception. Proc Nutr Soc 2007;66:331–345.
43. Schiffman SS. Effects of aging on the human taste system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1170:725–729.
44. Schiffman SS, Lindley MG, Clark TB, Makino C. Molecular mechanism of sweet taste: relationship of hydrogen bonding to taste sensitivity for both young and elderly. Neurobiol Aging 1981;2:173–185.
45. Stevens JC, Cruz LA, Hoffman JM, Patterson MQ. Taste sensitivity and aging: high incidence of decline revealed by repeated threshold measures. Chem Senses 1995;20:451–459.
46. Strehler BL, Mildvan AS. General theory of mortality and aging. Science 1960;132:14–21.
47. van Wymelbeke V, Jiang T, Pfitzenmeyer P. Change in taste preference in undernourished elderly hospitalized subjects during periods of infection and convalescence. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13(1):40–45.
48. Yang WG, Chen CB, Wang ZX, Liu YP, Wen XY, Zhang SF, Sun TW. A case-control study on the relationship between salt intake and salty taste and risk of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:2049–2053.
49. Yon M, Lee MS, Oh SI, Park SC, Kwak CS. Assessment of food consumption, dietary diversity and dietary pattern during the summer in middle aged adults and older adults living in Gugoksoondam longevity area, Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2010;15(4):536–549.
50. Yoon SC, Hur YK, Choi JK. Suprathreshold taste intensities for salt, sucrose, citric acid and quinine HCl in elderly Korean women. Korean J Oral Med 2007;32(4):383–396.

Article information Continued

Table 1

General characteristics of the subjects

Table 1

1) p-value of the χ2-test

2) Mean ± SD

3) N (%)

***: p < 0.001

Table 2

Concentrations of recognition threshold of 4 basic taste qualities and pleasant salty taste by gender

Table 2

1) p-value of the t-test, 2) Mean ± SD

**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001

Table 3

Concentration of recognition thresholds of 4 basic taste qualities and pleasant salty taste by age groups

Table 3

1) p-value of the t-test, 2) Mean ± SD

*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001

Table 4

Correlation coefficient among recognition threshold of tastes and pleasant salty taste adjusted by age and gender

Table 4

1) Pearson's correlation coefficient

*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001

Table 5

Preferences of taste of food by gender

Table 5

1) p-value of the χ2-test, 2) % of subjects

*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01

Table 6

Preferences of salty food by recognition threshold of salty taste group, pleasant salty taste group and gender

Table 6

1) p-value of the χ2-test

2) Recognition threshold of NaCl group: low group: below mean value of recognition threshold, high group: above mean value of recognition threshold

3) % of subjects

4) Pleasant salty taste group: low group: below mean value of concentration of pleasant salty taste, high group: above mean value of concentration of pleasant salty taste

***: p < 0.001

Table 7

Education and food behaviors of subjects by recognition threshold of salty taste group and pleasant salty taste group

Table 7

1) Recognition threshold of NaCl group: low group: below mean value of recognition threshold, high group: above mean value of recognition threshold

2) p-value of the t-test

3) Pleasant salty taste group: low group: below mean value of concentration of pleasant salty taste, high group: above mean value of concentration of pleasant salty taste

4) Mean ± SD

5) Brown (2008)

*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001