Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-09.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Current Status and Strategic Plan of Nutrition Education Comparing Nutrition Teachers with Dietitians in Schools, Gyeonggi Area

Current Status and Strategic Plan of Nutrition Education Comparing Nutrition Teachers with Dietitians in Schools, Gyeonggi Area

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2013;18(3):233-242
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.3.233
Seokcheon Elementary School, Hwaseong, Korea.
1Department of Nutrition Education, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Korea.
Corresponding author: Joung-hee Lee, Department of Nutrition Education, Graduate School of Education, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 443-760, Korea. Tel: (031) 249-9295, Fax: (031) 249-9036, joungheelee@kgu.ac.kr
Received 2013 May 16; Revised 2013 June 24; Accepted 2013 June 28.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how implementation of direct nutrition education differs between nutrition teachers and dietitians in Gyeonggi Area. In this study, we collected data from 107 nutrition teachers and 129 dietitians in 2012. Among those who have answered they implemented direct nutrition education for the last one year, 36% were nutrition teachers and 10% were dietitians (p < 0.05). Among subjects who implemented direct education, a significantly greater percentage of nutrition teachers used a class as an education time to conduct creative hands-on-activity compare to dietitians (p < 0.05). However, for most dietitians, school meal time was more commonly used for direct nutrition education. When asked to make a suggestion regarding improvement for school nutrition education, the highest rate of people chose simplification of school administrative work (4.68 points) was needed. Developing nutrition education (4.55 points) showed the next highest rate. The rest of the answers were the following order; regular training of teaching methods (4.50 points), increasing awareness of school teachers (4.50 points), improving school facilities and financial support (4.47 points), preparing teaching plan (4.46 points), providing incentive for direct education (4.26 points), organizing regular class for nutrition education (4.17 points), and placing nutrition teachers (4.16 points). This study provides useful information including manageable workload of nutrition teachers and dietitians, capacity building and supportive school environment to be delivered with respect to nutrition education system in South Korea.

References

1. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. Development of operation planning of school meals for year 2012 2012. cited 2013 June 15. 1–32. Available from http://www.goe.go.kr.
2. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. Development of operation planning of school meals for year 2013 2013. cited 2013 June 20. 1–32. Available from http://www.goe.go.kr.
3. Joung JW, Ha KH. A study on the activating schemes of the dietary education in Korean primary and secondary schools. J Korean Teach Educ 2002;19(3):213–233.
4. Kang IS, Ko J, Kwon SD, Lee SH, Lee AR, Lim KS, Jeong YJ, Kim JM, Kang BK, Jo HY, Kim UJ. A study on training and appointment system of nutrition teachers Ministry of Education; 2003. p. 1–42.
5. Kim HH, Park YH, Shin EK, Shin KH, Bae IS, Lee YK. Students' and parents' perceptions of nutrition education inelementary schools. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2006;35(8):1016–1024.
6. Kim HY. Nutrition knowledge and food habits of college students. Korean J Nutr 1984;17(3):178–184.
7. Kim JH. The study of the reality of nutritional education, before and after working as nutrition teachers Kangwon National University; 2010. 24–35. MS thesis.
8. Kim JS, Park MS, Cho YS, Lee JW. Effects of school-based nutrition education for Korean food guide on food intakefrequency of adolescents. Korean J Community Nutr 2005;10(5):582–591.
9. Kim KH. Effects of eating habits and control of overeating of obese children on body weight control program. Korean J Food Cult 2005;20(4):476–486.
10. Kim K, Park E. Nutrient density of fast-food consumed by the middle school students in Cheongju city. Korean J Community Nutr 2005;10(3):271–280.
11. Kim MH, Lee KA. A comparison of the perceptions of children and their mothers of the effects of school lunch programs on children's dietary behaviors. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2003;32(4):636–644.
12. Ko SY, Kim KW. Nutrition label use, self-efficacy, snacking and eating behavior of middle school students in Kyunggi area. Korean J Community Nutr 2010;15(4):513–524.
13. Ku JO. A study on status of nutrition education at elementary school. National dietitian conference 1999. p. 37–71.
14. Kwak DK. A study on role enhancement and attitude of school dietitians. Nutr Diet 2003;26(6):15–17.
15. Lee BS. School feeding and nutrition teachers. Nutr Diet 2003;26(6):18–23.
16. Lee EJ, So HK, Choi BS. Problems analysis related to nutrition and the development of nutrition education programs for high school students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2007;17(3):351–363.
17. Lee JC, Kim MH. A study on dietary related factors and blood parameters of obese children residing in Samcheok. J Korean Diet Assoc 2005;11(2):190–204.
18. Lee JE. A study on the nutrition education's actual conditions and recognition of the school nutrition teachers and nutritionists in Kyonggi-Do Kyonggi University; 2007. 27–42. MS thesis.
19. Lee MG. Perception and needs on nutritional education among school nutrition teachers and dietitians in Daejeon Paichai University; 2011. 13–31. MS thesis.
20. Lee Y, Shim JE, Yoon JH. Change of children's meal structure in terms of temporal and spatial dimensions: analysis of the data from the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey of 1998 and 2009. Korean J Community Nutr 2012;17(1):109–118.
21. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Current state of school meals for year 2011 2011. cited 2013 May 27. 7. Available from http://www.mest.go.kr.
22. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea health statistics 2011: Korea national health examination survey V-2 2012. p. 344–413.
23. Shin EK, Lee HS, Lee YK. Effect of nutrition education program in obese children and their parents (II) - Focus on nutrition knowledge, eating behaviors, food habit and nutrient intakes. Korean J Community Nutr 2004;9(5):578–588.
24. Song YS. The effect of nutrition course on the nutrition knowledge and food habits in college students. Korean J Nutr 1986;19(6):420–426.
25. Yang IS. Development of the standardized school food service dietitian indices by job analysis Ministry of Education; 1999. p. 78–88.
26. Yeo SH. The actual condition of nutrition education of nutrition teacher and research of duty change and job stress: focused on Kyung-Sang-Nam-Do region Pusan University; 2012. 11–48. MS thesis.
27. Yun ES. The current status of nutrition education and the improvement plan for nutrition teachers in Chungcheongnamdo Chungnam University; 2010. 32–42. MS thesis.

Article information Continued

Table 1

General characteristic of subjects

Table 1

1) N (%)

***: p < 0.001

Table 2

Implementation of nutrition education

Table 2

1) N (%)

***: p < 0.001

Table 3

Time for direct nutrition education and teaching method

Table 3

1) N (%)

*: p < 0.05

Table 4

Preparation and collection methods of teaching plan and education materials

Table 4

1) Each item was measured by 5-point scale (1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, 5 = never).

2) N (%)

3) Each item was measured by 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never using) to 5 (always using).

4) Means ± SD

*: p < 0.05

Table 5

Training participation and training place

Table 5

1) N (%)

*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001

Table 6

Suggestions for improving school nutrition education

Table 6

1) Mean ± SD, Each item was measured by 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all important) to 5 (very important).

*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001