Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
A Study on Nutritional Status and Dietary Quality of University Students by Body Image


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

A Study on Nutritional Status and Dietary Quality of University Students by Body Image

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2012;17(5):543-554
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 October 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.5.543
Jee-Young Yeon, Seung-Hee Hong1, Yun-Jung Bae1
Nutrition Policy Division, Nutrition Policy Office, Korea Food and Drug Administration, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea.
1Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Hanbuk University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Corresponding author: Yun-Jung Bae, Department of Food and Nutritional Sceiences Hanbuk University, 233-1 Sangpae-dong, Dongducheon-si, Gyeonggi-do 483-777, Korea. Tel: (031) 860-1445, Fax: (031) 860-1449, byj@hanbuk.ac.kr
Received 2012 September 13; Revised 2012 October 29; Accepted 2012 October 29.

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the satisfaction of body image, dietary habits, nutrition intake and dietary quality according to body image of university students (n = 290). The subjects (male = 178, female = 112) were classified to lean, normal and overweight/fat groups according to body image. The weight, body fat and body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the students who recognized their body image as 'overweight/fat'. The satisfaction of body image, interest of weight control and experience of weight control were significantly higher in students who recognized their body image as 'normal' in both the male and female subjects. The intakes of nutrients, dietary habits and life styles were not different according to body image. In the male subjects, the niacin intake density, the nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) of vitamin B1 and the dietary diversity score (DDS) in the students who recognized their body image as 'overweight/fat' were significantly lower than in students who recognized their body image as 'normal' and 'lean'. In female subjects, no significant differences in nutrient intakes, NAR, MAR and DDS were observed according to body image. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed for further assessment of the relationship between nutritional status/diet quality and body image in university students.

Keywords: body image; diet quality; university students; satisfaction with body image

References

1. Bae YJ, Kim EY, Yeon JY, Cho HK, Lee JS, Kim MH, Kim MH. Evaluation of dietary behavior, nutrient and food intake status, and dietary quality based on Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) in female university students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2010. 20(4)491–501.
2. Chin JH, Chang KJ. College students' attitude toward body weight control, health-related lifestyle and dietary behavior by self-perception on body image and obesity index. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2005. 34(10)1559–1565.
3. Chung HK, Lee HY. The concepts of weight control and dietary behaviors in high school seniors. Korean J Nutr 2010. 43(6)607–619.
4. Hong MS, Pak HO, Sohn CY. A study on food behaviors and nutrient intakes according to body mass index and body image recognition in female university students from Incheon. Korean J Food Nutr 2011. 24(3)386–395.
5. Jin YH, You KH. A study on the eating habit and eating out behavior of the university students in the Gyeonggi area. Korean J Community Nutr 2010. 15(5)687–693.
6. Kant AK, Block G, Schatzkin A, Ziegler RG, Nestle M. Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976-1980. J Am Diet Assoc 1991. 91(12)1526–1531.
7. Kant AK. Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996. 96(8)785–791.
8. Kim KH. Comparisons of dietary, living habits and blood parameters in underweight and overweight university students. Korean J Food Cult 2006. 21(4)366–374.
9. Kim MH, Jeong ES, Kim EJ, Chol HK, Bae YJ, Choi MK. Night eating status of university students in partial area of Chungnam. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2011. 21(4)563–576.
10. Kim SY, Lee HM, Song KH. Body image recognition and dietary behaviors of college students according to the body mass index. Korean J Community Nutr 2007. 12(1)3–12.
11. Krebs-Smith SM, Smiciklas-Wright H, Guthrie HA, Krebs-Smith J. The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. J Am Diet Assoc 1987. 87(7)897–903.
12. Lee JH, Kim MS, O JH. A comparative study on perceptions of body image, body satisfaction, and dietary habits of beauty art major and non-major female college students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2007. 17(4)463–473.
13. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW]. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDCP]. Korea Health Statistics 2009: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES IV-3) 2010. Seoul:
14. Mirmiran P, Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. Dietary diversity score in adolescents - a good indicator of the nutritional adequacy of diets: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2004. 13(1)56–60.
15. Park KA. Dietary habits, body weight satisfaction and eating disorders according to the body mass index of female university students in Kyungnam province. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2009. 19(6)891–908.
16. Ries CP, Daehler JL. Evaluation of the nutrient guide as a dietary assessment tool. J Am Diet Assoc 1986. 86(2)228–233.
17. Szponar L, Rychlik E. Dietary intake elderly subjects in rural and urban area in Poland. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2002. 13(78)490–496.
18. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2010. Seoul:
19. World Health Organization. The asia-pacific perspective. Redefining obesity and its treatment. International Diabetes Institute [internet] 2000. Sydney: Health communications Australia Pty Ltd.; Available from http://www.obesity.asiapacific.com/dafault.htm\.
20. Yeon JY, Bae YJ. Evaluation of nutrient and food intake status, and dietary quality -Focused on comparison with overweight and normal female university students-. Korean J Food Nutr 2010. 23(4)453–461.
21. You JS, Chin JH, Chang KJ. Prevalence of constipation, bowel habits and nutrient intakes of college students in Incheon area. Korean J Nutr 2009. 42(8)702–713.

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Dietary diversity score (DDS) of subjects by body image.

Table 1

Age and anthropometric measurements of subjects by gender

Table 1

1) Mean ± SD

2) Not significant

Table 2

Age and anthropometric measurements of subjects by body image

Table 2

1) Significance as determined by GLM test

2) Significance as determined by t-test

3) Mean ± SD

4) Not significant

5) Means with different superscripts (a~c) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 3

Satisfaction with body image and interest of weight control in subjects by body image

Table 3

1) Significance as determined by χ2 test

2) %

Table 4

Life style and dietary habits of subjects by body image

Table 4

1) Significance as determined by χ2 test, 2) %, 3) Not significant, 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Significance as determined by GLM test (Not significant), 6) Significance as determined by t-test (Not significant), 7) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 5

Mean daily energy and nutrient intakes of subjects by body image

Table 5

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant, 5) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 6

Food intakes from each food group of subjects by body image

Table 6

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant

Table 7

NAR and MAR of subjects by body image

Table 7

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant, 5) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 8

Distribution of food group intake pattern (GMVFD)1) of subjects by body image

Table 8

1) GMVFD: grains, meats, vegetables, fruits, dairys food group

1: food group(s) present, 0: food group (s) absent

For example, GMVFD = 11111 denotes that all food group (grains, meats, vegetables, fruits, dairys food group) were consumed