Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-09.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Egg Consumption and Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adults: Based on 2007-2008 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Egg Consumption and Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adults: Based on 2007-2008 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2011;16(3):364-374
Publication date (electronic) : 2011 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2011.16.3.364
Department of Food & Nutrition, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Korea.
Corresponding author: Kyong Park, Department of Food & Nutrition, Yeungnam University, 214-1 Dae-dong, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-749, Korea. Tel: (053) 810-2879, Fax: (053) 810-4768, kypark@ynu.ac.kr
Received 2011 May 04; Revised 2011 June 07; Accepted 2011 June 21.

Abstract

There is a great public concern that higher consumption of eggs may increase the risk of chronic disease due to high levels of cholesterol in eggs. In contrast to this concern, limited studies have examined this relationship, and the study results have been inconsistent. This study was to evaluate the cross-sectional associations between egg consumption, blood markers and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. We analyzed data from the combined 2007-2008 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Egg intakes were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Metabolic syndrome was ascertained using criteria of the NCEP ATP III (2001) and abdominal obesity criteria of the WHO. In 5,548 subjects, 937 subjects were defined as having metabolic syndrome. In linear regression models, subjects reporting one or more egg consumption per day had significantly lower levels of triglyceride, fasting blood glucose and blood pressure, and a higher level of HDL cholesterol, compared to those who rarely consumed eggs (P-trends < 0.05). After adjustments for potential confounding factors, the associations were no longer significant except for total cholesterol, showing higher levels with frequent egg consumption. More frequent intakes of egg (1 egg or more/day) were associated with lower risk of metabolic syndrome in a logistic regression model (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.96), but this association also became insignificant after adjustments for multiple confounding factors (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.71-1.57). In healthy Korean adults, frequent intakes of eggs did not adversely affect the risk of metabolic syndrome. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

References

1. Aune D, Ursin G, Veierød MB. Meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetologia 2009. 52(11)2277–2287.
2. Ballesteros MN, Cabrera RM, Saucedo Mdel S, Fernandez ML. Dietary cholesterol does not increase biomarkers for chronic disease in a pediatric population from northern Mexico. Am J Clin Nutr 2004. 80(4)855–861.
3. Bartov I, Reiser R, Henderson GR. Hypercholesterolemic effect in the female rat of egg yolk versus crystalline cholesterol dissolved in lard. J Nutr 1973. 103(10)1400–1405.
4. Chakrabarty G, Bijlani RL, Mahapatra SC, Mehta N, Lakshmy R, Vashisht S, Manchanda SC. The effect of ingestion of egg on serum lipid profile in healthy young free-living subjects. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2002. 46(4)492–498.
5. Dawber TR, Nickerson RJ, Brand FN, Pool J. Eggs, serum cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1982. 36(4)617–625.
6. Djousse L, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Lee IM. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Diabetes Care 2009. 32(2)295–300.
7. Djousse L, Kamineni A, Nelson TL, Carnethon M, Mozaffarian D, Siscovick D, Mukamal KJ. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2010. 92(2)422–427.
8. Flynn MA, Heine B, Nolph GB, Naumann HD, Parisi E, Ball D, Krause G, Ellersieck M, Ward SS. Serum lipids in humans fed diets containing beef or fish and poultry. Am J Clin Nutr 1981. 34(12)2734–2741.
9. Flynn MA, Nolph GB, Flynn TC, Kahrs R, Krause G. Effect of dietary egg on human serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Am J Clin Nutr 1979. 32(5)1051–1057.
10. Ford ES. Risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes associated with the metabolic syndrome: a summary of the evidence. Diabetes Care 2005. 28(7)1769–1778.
11. Hegsted DM, McGandy RB, Myers ML, Stare FJ. Quantitative effects of dietary fat on serum cholesterol in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1965. 17(5)281–295.
12. Hopkins PN. Effects of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol: a meta-analysis and review. Am J Clin Nutr 1992. 55(6)1060–1070.
13. Keys A. Serum cholesterol response to dietary cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr 1984. 40(2)351–359.
14. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Fourth Korea Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Manual (2007-2009) 2010.
15. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & Korea Health Industry Development Institute. In-Depth Analysis on the 3rd Korea Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Nutrition Survey 2007.
16. Mattson FH, Erickson BA, Kligman AM. Effect of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1972. 25(6)589–594.
17. Porter MW, Yamanaka W, Carlson SD, Flynn MA. Effect of dietary egg on serum cholesterol and triglyceride of human males. Am J Clin Nutr 1977. 30(4)490–495.
18. Pyörälä K. Dietary cholesterol in relation to plasma cholesterol and coronary heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1987. 455 Suppl. 1176–1184.
19. Resnick HE, Jones K, Ruotolo G, Jain AK, Henderson J, Lu W, Howard BV. Strong Heart Study. Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic American indians: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2003. 26(3)861–867.
20. Shi Z, Yuan B, Zhang C, Zhou M, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Egg consumption and the risk of diabetes in adults, Jiangsu, China. Nutrition 2011. 27(2)194–198.
21. Song Y, Manson JE, Buring JE, Liu S. A prospective study of red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women: the women's health study. Diabetes Care 2004. 27(9)2108–2115.
22. Srilatha B, Adaikan PG, Ng SC, Aulkumaran S. Effects of feeding egg yolk on the serum lipid levels in rabbits. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1997. 19(7)489–492.
23. van Dam RM, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Dietary patterns and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in U.S. men. Ann Intern Med 2002. 136(3)201–209.
24. Weggemans RM, Zock PL, Katan MB. Dietary cholesterol from eggs increases the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001. 73(5)885–891.

Article information Continued

Table 1-1

General characteristics of subjects by age

Table 1-1

All P-values were derived by chi-square tests

Table 1-2

General characteristics of subjects according to the frequency of egg consumption

Table 1-2

All P-values were derived by chi-square tests

Table 2-1

Metabolic bio-markers of subjects by age

Table 2-1

Data are mean

Table 2-2

Metabolic bio-markers of subjects according to the frequency of egg consumption

Table 2-2

Data are mean

Table 3-1

Nutrient intakes of subjects by age

Table 3-1

All nutrients are presented as adjusted means for energy intake and sex

Table 3-2

Nutrient intakes of subjects according to the frequency of egg consumption

Table 3-2

All nutrients are presented as adjusted means for energy intake, age and sex

Table 4

Relationship between frequency of egg consumption and metabolic bio-markers

Table 4

Data are β-coefficients

Model 1: Unadjusted model; Model 2: adjustment for age, sex, energy, and BMI; Model 3: Model 2 + additional adjustment for alcohol consumption (never, < = 1/mo, < = 1/wk, 2-3/wk, or 4+/wk), smoking status (never, former, or current), physical activity, and income (low, mid low, mid high, or high); Model 4: Model 3 + additional adjustment for protein (g/day), fat (g/day), carbohydrate (g/day), calcium (mg/day), phosphorus (mg/day), and riboflavin intakes (mg/day)

1) Triglycerides were logarithmically transformed for the purpose of analysis, and β-coefficients were presented in the log scale (% change of triglycerides)

Table 5

Odds ratio (95% CI) for metabolic syndrome according to the frequency of egg consumption (N=5,548)

Table 5

Model 1: Unadjusted model; Model 2: adjustment for age, sex, energy, and BMI; Model 3: Model 2 + additional adjustment for alcohol consumption (never, < = 1/mo, < = 1/wk, 2 . 3/wk, or 4+/wk), smoking status (never, former, or current), physical activity, and income (low, mid low, mid high, or high); Model 4: Model 3 + additional adjustment for protein (g/day), fat (g/day), carbohydrate (g/day), calcium (mg/day), phosphorus (mg/day), and riboflavin intakes (mg/day)