Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Assessment of the Support Program of Foodservice Management for Community Child Centers in Jeollanam-do, Korea

Assessment of the Support Program of Foodservice Management for Community Child Centers in Jeollanam-do, Korea

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2012;17(1):91-100
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 February 29
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.1.91
1)Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
2)Geumcheon-gu Center for Child-care Foodservice Management, Seoul, Korea.
3)Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Jihyun Yoon, Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea. Tel: (02) 880-8750, Fax: (02) 884-0305, hoonyoon@snu.ac.kr
Received 2011 December 31; Revised 2012 February 01; Accepted 2012 February 02.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the foodservice management support program focusing on menu management in community child centers. The support program provided reference menus, staff training, and field consulting to 10 community child centers in the Jeollanam-do province for one month, August in 2010. One month menus were developed, based on children's preference for menu items, foodservice personnel's preference for food materials, and availability of local specialty foods, and offered as reference menus. In addition, staff training and field consulting focusing on menu management were conducted before and during the pilot period, respectively. To evaluate the support program, menus, foodservice personnel's knowledge level and perceived performance in foodservice management, and children's level of satisfaction for foodservice were analyzed before and after the support program. As a result of analysis of 222 and 210 menus of before and after the support program, respectively, the number of dishes per meal increased from five to six on average, and the proportion of meals including five food groups, which were grain, meat, vegetable, fruit, and milk and dairy product, rose from 2% to 24%. Foodservice personnel's knowledge level regarding foodservice management increased significantly (p = 0.007), however, their perceived performance in foodservice management did not show any significant changes. Children were more satisfied with 'food' (p = 0.001), 'sanitation' (p = 0.001), and 'environment' (p < 0.008) of foodservice in community child centers after the support program. In conclusion, the foodservice management support program focusing on menu management in this study was effective for improving menu quality of and children's satisfaction with foodservice in community child centers.

Notes

This research was supported by a grant (10062 Sikpuman 035) from Korea Food and Drug Administration in 2010.

References

1. Asano K, Yoon J, Yoon B. Appropriate size and dish combination of nutritional-balanced lunch boxes delivered to children under the government-funded meal service program in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2009. 14(5)565–575.
2. Bae EJ, Kwon JH, Yoon HJ, Lee SK. Nutritional status of school lunch supported students in an elementary school. J Korean Diet Assoc 2001. 7(4)349–360.
3. Cho YR. Food sanitary practices and perception of employees in some food services 2000. Chungang University; 44. MS.
4. Choi MK, Choi SH, Lee SI. An assessment of customer satisfaction towards university residence hall foodservice and subjective QOL (Quality of Life): Focused on the university students in Daegu, Gyeongbuk area. Korean J Community Nutr 2009. 14(1)114–122.
5. Gordon A, Briefel R. Feeding low-income children when school is out-the summer food service program: Executive summary 2003. USDA: Economic Research Service;
6. Jeon EK, Bae HJ. Evaluation of sanitation management performance within school foodservice facilities and utilities in Gyeongbuk province. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2009. 25(1)62–73.
7. Jung HJ, Moon SJ, Lee LH, Yu CH, Paik HY, Yang IS, Moon HK. Evaluation of elementary school foodservice menus on its nutrient contents and diversity of the food served. Korean J Nutr 1997. 30(7)854–869.
8. Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Block G, Ziegler RG, Nestle M. Food group intake patterns and associated nutrient profiled of the US population. J Am Diet Assoc 1991. 91(12)1526–1531.
9. Kim ES. A study on improving the efficiency of the free feeding system for poorly-fed children in Gangwon province 2007b. Gangwon: Development Research Institute; 139–165.
10. Kim HJ, Yoon JS. Food diversity and nutrient intake of elementary school students in Daegu-Kyungbook area. Korean J Community Nutr 2010. 15(3)297–307.
11. Kim MS. Status on foodservice program for low-income children 2007a. National Human Rights Commission of Korea; 127–193.
12. Kim YH, Cho YB. A study on the perception and satisfaction with school food service among High School Students in the Busan and Kyungnam Area. Korean J Culinary Res 2009. 15(2)338–347.
13. Kwon S, Lee KW, Yoon J. Diet of children under the government-funded meal support program in Korea. Nutr Res Pract 2010. 4(6)515–521.
14. Lee HW. An evaluation of the lunch programs for the children in need : Comparison of the parents' program satisfaction among the three types of institutions. J Korean Soc Child Welf 1999. 879–102.
15. Lee JH. Dietary habits and nutrient intakes of children using community food service centers in different family type 2009. Kyunghee University; 36–37. MS thesis.
16. Lee MS, Lee JY, Yoon SH. Assessment of foodservice management performance at child care centers. Korean J Community Nutr 2006. 11(2)229–239.
17. Lee YE. An analysis on the satisfaction with the quality of school foodservice in Chungbuk province. Korean J Food Cult 2008. 23(1)105–114.
18. Lim YH, Kwak HO. A study on the sanitary management practics of institutional foodservice employees in Daejeon and Chungnam area. Korean J Food Cult 2006. 21(4)381–387.
19. Ministry for Health and Welfare. Dietary action guides for Korean children 2009.
20. Ministry of Health and Welfare & Headquarters for Community Child Center. Current status of community children's center 2011. 5–36.
21. Park JY, Ahn SS, Park HH. A study on differences food hygiene knowledge and practice between houswives and thecontract foodservice employees. Korean J Food Nutr 2006. 19(3)301–310.
22. Park ND. Current status of foodservice and improvement the efficiency of the free feeding system for poorly-fed children in Daejeon 2008. Daejeon Development Institute; 87–88.
23. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2010. Seoul: Hanareum Publishing Co.; 528–530.
24. Yang IS. Study on satisfaction in school foodservice 2007. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development report; 4–6.
25. Yang IS, Kim HA, Lee YE, Park MK, Park SY. The development of a quality measurement tool for a contractmanaged hospital foodservice. Korean J Community Nutr 2003. 8(3)319–326.
26. Yang IS, Lee BS, Cha JA, Han KY, Chae IS, Lee JM. Foodservice in institutions 2011. Paju: Kyomunsa Publishing Co.; 71–265.
27. Yoon B, Kwon S, Yoon J. Menu evaluation of meal boxes delivered to children from low-Income families during summer vacation. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 2011. 21(1)118–124.
28. Yoon J. Study on development the nutrition guideline for low-income children 2007. The Korea Food & Drug Administration report; 159.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Foodservice personnel's level of knowledge regarding foodservice management in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program (Unit : point)

**: p < 0.01

p-value by Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test

Table 1

General characteristics of the responding community child centers and foodservice personnel

Table 1

Table 2

General characteristics of the responding children

Table 2

Table 3

Number of dishes and food items per meal in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program

Table 3

1) by paired t-test

Table 4

Patterns of food groups per meal in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program

Table 4

1) G = grain, M = meat, V = vegetable, F = fruit, and D = dairy product group: 1 = food group (s) present, 0 = food group (s) absent

For example GMVFD = 11100 indicate that grain, meat and vegetable were provided and fruit and dairy product groups were not provided.

2) by chi-square test

3) Others included '10110', '10101', '10111', 11010', and '11000'

Table 5

Frequency of food groups not served in meals in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program

Table 5

1) by chi-square test

Table 6

Foodservice personnel's level of perceived performance of foodservice management in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program1)

Table 6

1) 1 point for never, 2 points for rarely, 3 points for neutral, 4 points for usually, or 5 points for always

2) by Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test

Table 7

Children's behavioral change recognized by foodservice personnels after the foodservice management support program1)

Table 7

1) 1 point for really decreasing, 2 points for decreasing, 3 points for no change, 4 points for increasing, and 5 points for really increasing

Table 8

Practice level of eating behavior guidelines of children in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program1)

Table 8

1) 1 point for strongly disagree, 2 points for disagree, 3 points for neutral, 4 points for agree, and 5 points for strongly agree

2) by paired t-test

Table 9

Children's level of satisfaction with foodservice in community child centers before and after the foodservice management support program1)

Table 9

1) 1 point for strongly disagree, 2 points for disagree, 3 points for neutral, 4 points for agree, and 5 points for strongly agree

2) by paired t-test