Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Nutrition Knowledge, Dietary Attitude, and Dietary Behavior among Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes


Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Nutrition Knowledge, Dietary Attitude, and Dietary Behavior among Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Article information

Korean J Community Nutr. 2013;18(2):101-111
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 April 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.2.101
Na-Yeon Noh, So-Young Nam, Hee-Suk Kang1, Ji-Eun Lee2, Soo-Kyung Lee
Department of Food and Nutrition, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
1Department of Pediatrics, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
2Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Corresponding author: Soo-Kyung Lee, Department of Food and Nutrition, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Namgu, Incheon 402-751, Korea. Tel: (032) 860-8121, Fax: (032) 860-8120, skleenutrition@inha.ac.kr
Received 2013 January 03; Revised 2013 March 15; Accepted 2013 April 01.

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes is on the rise worldwide. Although nutrition education for patients with diabetes has become a routine practice, specifics and impacts of such educations need to be more researched. This study examined the status of nutrition knowledge, dietary attitude, and dietary behavior among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (9-19 year-old) and explored factors influencing dietary behaviors related to diabetes by applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. Face-to-face interviews, using a pre-tested structured questionnaire, were conducted with 32 participants (11 boys and 21 girls) with type 1 diabetes followed by a diabetes clinic in a university hospital. This study found that the level of nutrition knowledge related to diabetes was generally low at 4 points out of a possible 10, however, the dietary attitude related to diabetes was found to be generally good at 26 points out of a possible 30. Participants were motivated to follow medical staff recommendations the most; however, their family was also important. Perceived behavioral control was low especially for eating-out and portion control. The dietary behavior related to blood glucose control showed low at 13 points out of a possible 20. Regression analysis showed that perceived behavioral control (p < 0.001) was significantly related to the dietary behavior related to blood glucose control. This rare study with children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes showed that nutrition education should include a component to improve perceived behavioral control through high-risk situation management.

Keywords: Type 1 diabetes; children; adolescent; Theory of Planned Behavior

Notes

This study was conducted with Inha University grant for SK Lee.

References

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991. 50179–211.
2. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012. 35Suppl 1. S11–S63.
3. Choe SJ, Park HR, Park DY, Ahn HS. A study on the sociopsychological factors influencing the dietary compliance of diabetics by using focus group interview. Korean J Community Nutr 2000. 5(1)23–35.
4. Chun JH, Jung SB, Sohn HS. Self-care and related factors in patients with diabetes. J Korean Diabetes Assoc 1999. 23(2)193–206.
5. Chung SO, Song OK, Ko JM, Wi JH, Lee TH, Yum JH, Cho DK, Son JH, Nam HW, Yoo HJ, Lee YN, Kim SG, Moon HK, Kim ES. The effects of teaching methods on the dietary compliance and hemoglobin a1c level in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Korean Diabetes Assoc 2000. 24560–573.
6. Holli BB, Calabrese RJ, Maillet JO. Communication and education skills for dietetics professionals 2003. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
7. Kang HJ, Shin EM, Kim KW. Evaluation of nutrition education for diabetes mellitus management of older adults. Korean J Community Nutr 2009. 14(6)734–745.
8. Karvonen M, Tuomilehto J, Libman I, LaPorte R. A review of the recent epidemiological data on the worldwide incidence of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1993. 36(10)883–892.
9. Kim KW, Shin EM. Using the theory of planned behavior to explain dairy food consumption among university female students. Korean J Community Nutr 2003. 8(1)53–61.
10. Kim HS, Park CS. Self-care and physical symptom by gender in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2003. 9(3)270–276.
11. Kim HY, Kang MH. Assessment of nutritional status 2008. Seoul: Shinkwang pub; 86–87.
12. Kim JH, Kim SM. A study on effects of short-term nutritional education on diabetic pediatric patient. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2000. 10(1)21–36.
13. Knip M. Descriptive epidemiology of type 1 diabetes-is it still in? Diabetologia 2012. 55(5)1227–1230.
14. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention & The Korean Pediatric Society. 2007 Korean National Growth Charts 2007.
15. Lee HW, Park HS. The variables affecting diabetic patient's self-care behaviors: An application of theory of planned behavior. Korean J Advert Public Relat 2010. 12(4)327–362.
16. Lee JR. Lifestyle modification and diabetes management. J Korean Diabetes 2011. 12(4)215–218.
17. Lee YW, Hwang WS, Choe SJ, Lee DH, Kim DH, Lee EH, Hong EG, Noh HY, Chung YS, Lee KW, Kim HM. The effect of intensive education on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. J Korean Soc Endocrinol 2003. 1863–72.
18. National Health Insurance Corporation. 2012. cited 2012 June 26. Available from http://www.nhic.or.kr.
19. NIDDK. National Diabetes Statistics 2011. cited 2012 July 26. Available from http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov.
20. Oh JY, Kim SB. Development and effect's analysis of nutrition education program for diabetes mellitus at community health center-focused on individual daily energy requirements and food exchange units-. Korean J Community Nutr 2010. 15(4)485–497.
21. Park DY. The effect of social support on compliance to dietary regimen in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Korean J Hum Ecol 2001. 4(1)108–120.
22. Park DY, Choe SJ, Park HR, Ahn HS. A study on the sociopsychological factors influencing the dietary compliance of diabetics using questionnaire. Korean J Community Nutr 2000. 5(1)36–49.
23. Park SY, Kim HR. A study on dietary compliance and related variables in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Korean J Nutr 1994. 27(4)356–367.
24. Park YS, Lee JW, Seo JS, Lee BK, Lee HS. Nutrition education and counseling 2006. Paju: Kyomoonsa; 2–4.
25. Seo HS, Lee SK, Nam SY. Factors influencing fast food consumption behaviors of middle-school students in Seoul: An application of theory of planned behaviors. Nutr Res Pract 2011. 5(2)169–178.
26. Shim WS, Hong SB, Choi YS, Choi YJ, Ahn SH, Min KY, Kim EJ, Park IB, Nam MS, Kim YS. Development of two parallel diabetes knowledge tests. J Korean Diabetes Assoc 2006. 30(6)476–486.
27. Shin CH. Epidemiologic characteristics of type 1 diabetes in children aged 14 years or under in Korea, 1985-2000. Korean J Pediatr 2008. 51(6)569–575.
28. Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, Plotnick L, Kaufman F, Laffel L, Deeb L, Grey M, Barbara A, Holzmeister LA, Clark N. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005. 28(1)186–212.
29. Silink M. Childhood diabetes: a global perspective. Horm Res 2002. 57Suppl 1. 1–5.
30. Smart C, Aslander-van Vliet E, Waldron S. Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2009. 10(Suppl 12)100–117.
31. Spiegel G, Bortsov A, Bishop FK, Owen D, Klingensmith GJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, Maahs DM. Randomized nutrition education intervention to improve carbohydrate counting in adolescents with type 1 diabetes study: Is more intensive education needed? J Acad Nutr Diet 2012. 1121736–1746.
32. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2010. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society;

Article information Continued

Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Table 1

General characteristics of the subjects

Table 1

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) N (%)

3) Fisher's exact test

4) Mean ± SD

5) Mann-Whitney U test

6) Single-parent family

Table 2

Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the subjects

Table 2

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD

3) Mann-Whitney U test

4) N (%)

5) Fisher's exact test

HAZ: Height for Age z-score

WAZ: Weight for Age z-score

BAZ: Body Mass Index for Age z-score

Table 3

Average intake of energy and nutrients

Table 3

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD, 3) Mann-Whitney U test

Table 4

Nutrition knowledge related to diabetes

Table 4

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) N (%), 3) Fisher's exact test, 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Mann-Whitney U test

Table 5

Attitude toward diabetes-related dietary behaviors

Table 5

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD, Response categories used a 5-point Likert scale (High scores indicate strong agreement.).

3) Mann-Whitney U test

Table 6

Subjective norms toward diabetes-related dietary behaviors

Table 6

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD, Response categories used a 5-point Likert scale (High scores indicate strong agreement.).

3) Mann-Whitney U test, 4) Data multiplied Normative Belief by Motivation to Comply

Table 7

Perceived behavioral control toward diabetes-related dietary behaviors

Table 7

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD, Response categories used a 5-point Likert scale (High scores indicate strong agreement.).

3) Mann-Whitney U test

Table 8

Behavioral intention and dietary behaviors related to blood glucose control

Table 8

1) Normal HbAlc level was defined as: 6 - 12 y < 8.0%, 13 - 19 y < 7.5% and > 19 y < 7.0%.

2) Mean ± SD, Response categories used a 5-point Likert scale (High scores indicate strong agreement.).

3) Mann-Whitney U test

Table 9

Multiple regressions on the Theory of Planned Behavior

Table 9

1) Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex.

2) Standardized parameter estimate R2 = 0.311, model F = 2.350, p = 0.069

3) Standardized parameter estimate R2 = 0.553, model F = 8.356, p = 0.000