Objective This study investigated the utilization and satisfaction of lunchbox by considering the dietary lifestyle of the consumer, in order to refine the purchasing behavior of adults with experience in using lunchboxes, and to provide basic data for efficient menu configuration and direction towards improvement. Methods A total of 600 adults in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do answered a self-administered questionnaire designed to investigate general characteristics, utilization, menu preference, satisfaction, prospection, and improvement of lunchbox, according to the dietary lifestyle. Results The study subjects were classified into 5 groups: ‘taste seeking group’, ‘safety seeking group’, ‘health seeking group’, ‘economic seeking group’ and ‘convenience seeking group. Considering purchase value of the lunchbox, the ‘taste seeking group’ had a high utilization rate (35.1%) for prices less than 4,000 won (p < 0.05). Lunchboxes were mainly purchased at the lunchbox store (43.3%) and convenience store (37.7%). The important factor that contributed to purchasing a lunchbox was taste (61.3%), which was highest in the ‘taste seeking group’ (p < 0.01). The ‘health seeking group’ showed the highest preference for the low-salt diet lunchbox menu (26.0%) (p < 0.05). The satisfaction of ‘health seeking groups’ was lowest when considering addition of condiments (2.34%), origin of ingredient (2.59%), and provided calorie (2.81%) (p < 0.05). The overall response indicated future use of the lunchbox (69.6%) (p < 0.01); 35.8% respondents recommended the purchase of lunchbox, where convenience of purchase was the highest factor contributing to recommendation (50.2%) (p < 0.05). Conclusions Taken together, our results indicate that taste was emphasized in every group purchasing the lunch box. Convenience of purchase was the highest factor contributing to satisfaction, which was relatively low when considering addition of condiments, nutrition and origin of ingredients. We propose that it is necessary to improve the development of various menus for increasing satisfaction by selecting the right ingredients contributing to good health of the consumer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Study on the Selection Attributes of Frozen Mandu (Korean Dumpling) for Adults in the Jeonbuk Area Using Conjoint Analysis Da Eun Gong, Sun A Choi, Jeong Ok Rho Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2024; 53(3): 297. CrossRef
Study on the Eating Out Behavior and the Status of Meal Delivery and Take-Out Consumption according to the Food-related Lifestyles of Adolescents : Using the Consumption Behavior Survey for Food in 2020 Eun Jung Lee, Hyeon Min Yang, Yeong Ju Lee, Sun A Choi, Jeong Ok Rho Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2024; 34(4): 284. CrossRef
Comparison of Eating Habits and Behaviors of Young Single-Person Households based on Food-Related Lifestyle Dokyung Kim, Sim-Yeol Lee Korean Journal of Health Promotion.2023; 23(3): 117. CrossRef
Beef Consumption Behavior amongst Korean Women: A Study Based on the Demographic Characteristics and Food-Related Lifestyle Kyung-Ran Lee, EunJung Lee, Jung-Tak Lee, Jin A Jang Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2023; 52(3): 323. CrossRef
How Does Adolescents’ Usage of Social Media Affect Their Dietary Satisfaction? Harry Jeong, Kwangsoo Shin International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(6): 3621. CrossRef
A Franchise Hamburger Menu for University Students Determined by Identifying Selection Attributes Using Conjoint Analysis Yu-Ni Choi, Sung-Suk Chung, Jeong-Ok Rho Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2022; 32(4): 250. CrossRef
Studies of Selection Attributes for Lunch Boxes (Dosirak) Using Conjoint Analysis among Single Men A Reum Han, Sung Suk Chung, Jeong Ok Rho Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2021; 50(8): 884. CrossRef
E-commerce Food Purchases by Adult Women according to their Household Types Yu-Jin Park, Yu-Mi Kim, Mi-Kyeong Choi Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2020; 25(6): 464. CrossRef