Hye Jin Kim; A Reum Lee; Kyung Won Kim

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.4.332

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 21(4); 2016 > Article

Research Article
Perception on Optimal Diet, Diet Problems and Factors Related to Optimal Diet Among Young Adult Women Using Focus Group Interviews: Based on Social Cognitive Theory: Hye Jin Kim, A Reum Lee, Kyung Won Kim; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2016;21(4):332-343.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.4.332
Published online: August 31, 2016

Food and Nutrition, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kyung Won Kim. Food and Nutrition, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul Women's University, 621 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01797, Korea. Tel: (02) 970-5647, Fax: (02) 976-4049, kwkim@swu.ac.kr

• Received: August 12, 2016 • Revised: August 19, 2016 • Accepted: August 23, 2016

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

166 Views
1 Download
5 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES

Abstract

Objectives
Study purpose was to investigate perception on diet, diet problems and related factors among young adult women using focus group interviews (FGI) based on the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT).
Methods
Eight groups of FGI were conducted with 47 female undergraduate or graduate students. Guide for FGI included questions regarding perception on optimal diet, diet problems and cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors of SCT. FGI were video, audio-taped, transcribed and analyzed by themes and sub-themes.
Results
Subjects showed irregular eating habits (skipping breakfast, irregular meal time) and selection of unhealthy foods as the main diet problems. Regarding cognitive factors related to optimal diet, subjects mentioned positive outcome expectations (e.g., health promotion, skin health, improvement in eating habits, etc.) and negative outcome expectations (e.g., annoying, hungry, expensive, taste). Factors that promoted optimal diet were mainly received from information from mobile or internet and access to menu or recipes. Factors that prevented optimal diet included influence from friends, lack of time and cooking skills. Behavioral factors for optimal diet included behavioral capability regarding snacks, healthy eating and smart food selection. Subjects mentioned mass media (mobile, internet, TV) as the influential physical environment, and significant others (parents, friends, grandparents) as the influential social environment in optimal diet. For education topics, subjects wanted to learn about healthy meals, basic nutrition, disease and nutrition, and weight control. They wanted to learn those aspects by using mobile or internet, lectures (cooking classes), campaign and events.
Conclusions
Study results might be used for planning education regarding optimal diet for young adult women. Education programs need to focus on increasing positive outcome expectations (e.g., health) and behavioral capability for healthy eating and food selection, reducing negative outcome expectations (e.g., cost, taste) and barriers, making supportive environments for optimal diet, and incorporating topics and methods found in this study.
Keywords: optimal diet; factors; young adult women; focus group interview; social cognitive theory

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research grant from Seoul Women's University (2015).

REFERENCES

1. Rha YA, Kang MJ, Lee SH, Kim JY. Nutrition intake according to food and exercise habits in female college students of Yang-ju si. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2015; 21(4): 284-293.Article
2. Choi KS, Shin KO, Huh SM, Chung KH. Comparison of nutritional and physical status according to the residental type among college women in Seoul women's university and Sahmyook university. Korean J Nutr 2010; 43(1): 86-96.Article
3. Lee BK, Lee JH. Evaluation of dietary variety by food habits in female university students. Korean J Food Nutr 2011; 24(4): 687-701.Article
4. Jang HB, Lee HY, Han HY, Song JH, Kim KN, Hyun TS. Changes in food and nutrient intakes of college students between 1999 and 2009. Korean J Community Nutr 2011; 16(3): 324-336.Article
5. Choi MJ, Lee YS. Nutrient intake and body composition analysis according to food habits in college females in Daegu area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2014; 24(1): 42-52.Article
6. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, selfefficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med 2007; 34(3): 304-312.Article PubMed
7. Lubans DR, Plotnikoff RC, Morgan PJ, Dewar D, Costigan S, Collins CE. Explaining dietary intake in adolescent girls from disadvantaged secondary schools. a test of social cognitive theory. Appetite 2012; 58(2): 517-524.PubMed
8. Mirzaei A, Ghofranipour F, Ghazanfari Z. Social cognitive predictors of breakfast consumption in primary school's male students. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8(1): 124-132.
9. Ahn SH, Kim HK, Kim KM, Yoon JS, Kwon JS. Development of nutrition education program for consumers to reduce sodium intake applying the social cognitive theory: based on focus group interviews. Korean J Community Nutr 2014; 19(4): 342-360.
10. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2008. p. 4-19.
11. Rosenthal M. Qualitative research methods: why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2016; 8(4): 509-516.
12. Park S, Kwon JS, Kim CI, Lee YN, Kim HK. Development of nutrition education program for hypertension based on health belief model, applying focus group interview. Korean J Community Nutr 2012; 17(5): 623-636.
13. Kim KM. Needs assessment of nutrition education for preschoolers and their parents using focus group interview. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2015; 25(1): 20-29.
14. Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
15. Lee SB, Jeong YR, Ahn HJ, Ahn MJ, Ryu SA, Kang NE. The development of a nutrition education program for lowincome family children by applying the social cognitive theory and health belief model. Korean J Community Nutr 2015; 20(3): 165-177.
16. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nurs Plus Open 2016; 2: 8-14.Article
17. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI-2). Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2015 12. Report No. 11-1351159-00027-10.
18. Choi KS, Shin KO, Huh SM, Chung KH. Analysis of dietary habits by MDA (mini dietary assessment) scores and physical development and blood parameters in female college students in Seoul area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2009; 19(6): 856-868.
19. Levitsky DA, Pacanowski CR. Effect of skipping breakfast on subsequent energy intake. Physiol Behav 2013; 119(2): 9-16.Article PubMed
20. Lee CR, Kim SK. Comparison of the dietary factors between normal and constipation groups by self-reported constipation in female college students. Korean J Community Nutr 2011; 16(1): 23-36.Article
21. Choi BB. Dietary habits and behaviors of college students in the northern Gyeonggi-do region. Korean J Food Nutr 2013; 26(3): 404-413.Article
22. McSpadden KE, Patrick H, Oh AY, Yaroch AL, Dwyer LA, Nebeling LC. The association between motivation and fruit and vegetable intake: the moderating role of social support. Appetite 2016; 96(1): 87-94.Article PubMed
23. Bruening M, MacLehose R, Eisenberg ME, Nanney MS, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Associations between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and fast-food restaurant frequency among adolescents and their friends. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014; 46(4): 277-285.PubMed PMC
24. Hartman H, Wadsworth DP, Penny S, van Assema P, Page R. Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among students in a New Zealand university. Results of focus group interviews. Appetite 2013; 65(1): 35-42.
25. Miller LMS, Cassady DL. The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature. Appetite 2015; 92(1): 207-216.
26. Rustad C, Smith C. Nutrition knowledge and associated behavior changes in a holistic, short-term nutrition education intervention with low-income women. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013; 45(6): 490-498.PubMed
27. Kirsch AC, Shapiro JB, Conley CS, Heinrichs G. Explaining the pathway from familial and peer social support to disordered eating: Is body dissatisfaction the link for male and female adolescents? Eat Behav 2016; 22: 175-181.PubMed
28. Leak TM, Benavente L, Goodell LS, Lassiter A, Jones L, Bowen S. EFNEP graduates' perspectives on social media to supplement nutrition education: focus group findings from active users. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014; 46(3): 203-208.PubMed
29. Sidani JE, Shensa A, Hoffman B, Hanmer J, Primack BA. The association between social media use and eating concerns among US young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 2016; Forthcoming.
30. Kwak JE, Lee SY, Lee SH, Ko KS. A survey for needs and preference of food and nutrition information on mass media for Korean female adults. Korean J Community Nutr 2014; 19(6): 550-557.
31. Li Y, Wang X, Lin X, Hajli M. Seeking and sharing health information on social media: A net valence model and crosscultural comparison. Technol Forecast Soc 2016; Forthcoming.
32. Tobey LN, Manore MM. Social media and nutrition education: the food hero experience. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014; 46(2): 128-133.PubMed

Table 1

Focus group interview guide based on social cognitive theory

Table 2

General characteristics of the study subjects

1) Mean±SD

2) n (%)

Table 3

Perception on optimal diet and diety problems of the study subjects

Table 4

The major themes and sub-themes of cognitive factors regarding optimal diet

Table 5

The major themes and sub-themes of behavioral factors regarding optimal diet

Table 6

The major themes and sub-themes of environmental factors regarding optimal diet

Table 7

The major themes and sub-themes for dietary education

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors affecting sugar intake in adults based on the social cognitive theory
Kilye Kim, Yeon-Kyung Lee
Journal of Nutrition and Health.2024; 57(1): 120. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Need for Obesity Prevention Education Programs through Analysis of Factors Affecting Student Obesity Factors in Seoul during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Seoung Hi Kim, Seonyeong Baek, Min Jeong Choi, Sunny Ham
Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2022; 32(3): 214. CrossRef
Focus Group Interviews with U.S. Americans with Respect to Recipe and Sensory Characteristics of Seolgitteok (Korean Rice-Flour Cake)
Han-Seok Seo, Sungeun Cho
Korean Journal of Food and Cookery Science.2018; 34(1): 15. CrossRef
Meal Types by Cooking Method Consumed by Korean Adults according to Meal Provision Place: Using 2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Mi-Kyung Choi
Korean Journal of Food & Cookery Science.2017; 33(3): 264. CrossRef
Utilization of Internet Dietary Information by University Students in Seoul and Gyeonggi Area
Young Eun Kang, Sim Yeol Lee
Korean Journal of Human Ecology.2016; 25(6): 811. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Perception on Optimal Diet, Diet Problems and Factors Related to Optimal Diet Among Young Adult Women Using Focus Group Interviews: Based on Social Cognitive Theory

Korean J Community Nutr. 2016;21(4):332-343. Published online August 31, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.4.332

XML Download

We recommend

Perception on Optimal Diet, Diet Problems and Factors Related to Optimal Diet Among Young Adult Women Using Focus Group Interviews: Based on Social Cognitive Theory

Table 1

Focus group interview guide based on social cognitive theory

Table 2

General characteristics of the study subjects

1) Mean±SD

2) n (%)

Table 3

Perception on optimal diet and diety problems of the study subjects

Table 4

The major themes and sub-themes of cognitive factors regarding optimal diet

Table 5

The major themes and sub-themes of behavioral factors regarding optimal diet

Table 6

The major themes and sub-themes of environmental factors regarding optimal diet

Table 7

The major themes and sub-themes for dietary education

Table 1 Focus group interview guide based on social cognitive theory

Table 2 General characteristics of the study subjects

1) Mean±SD

2) n (%)

Table 3 Perception on optimal diet and diety problems of the study subjects

Table 4 The major themes and sub-themes of cognitive factors regarding optimal diet

Table 5 The major themes and sub-themes of behavioral factors regarding optimal diet

Table 6 The major themes and sub-themes of environmental factors regarding optimal diet