Department of Food and Nutrition, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea.
Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0004472).
1) Mean ± SD
2) [Body weight (kg) / Standard weight (kg)] × 100
3) Body fat (%) measured by Inbody 720
4) Muscle mass (kg) calculated by Heymsfield's formular
5) Body muscle (%) = [Muscle (kg) / body weight (kg)] * 100
abc means significant difference (p < 0.05) among groups by Duncan's multiple range test
All data are same after controlling for age using ANCOVA among groups
Gender distribution of subjects by school and obese group (N = 137)
1) N (%)
2) NS: No Significant
3) MS: Metabolic Syndrome
Significant difference at ***: p < 0.001
Distribution of risk factors of MS by obese group in total subjects (N = 137)
1) N (%)
Significant difference at **: p < 0.01
Distribution of risk factors of MS in total subjects (N = 137)
1) N (%)
Significant difference at *: p < 0.05
Anthropometric measurements of subjects by obese groups (N = 137)
1) Mean ± SD
2) [Body weight (kg) / Standard weight (kg)] × 100
3) Body fat (%) measured by Inbody 720
4) Muscle mass (kg) calculated by Heymsfield's formular
5) Body muscle (%) = [Muscle (kg) / body weight (kg)] * 100
abc means significant difference (p < 0.05) among groups by Duncan's multiple range test
All data are same after controlling for age using ANCOVA among groups
Biochemistry characteristics of subjects by obese group (N = 137)
1) Mean ± SD
abc means significant difference at p < 0.05 among groups by Duncan's multiple range test
All data are same after controlling for age using ANCOVA among groups
Pearson's correlation coefficient of HOMA-IR with anthropometric and biochemical variables of blood in subjects
1) % IBW = [body weight (kg) / standard weight (cm)] × 100
2) Body fat (%) = measured by inbody 720
3) Muscle mass (kg) was calculated by Heymsfield's formular
Significant difference at ***: p < 0.001
Comparison of daily nutrient intakes in normal weight, obese without MS and obese with MS groups
1) Mean ± SD
abc means significant difference at p < 0.05 among groups by Duncan's multiple range test
Comparison of nutrient adequacy ratio(NAR) and mean adequacy ratio (MAR)
1) Mean ± SD
No significant difference except Vit E among obese groups by Duncan's multiple range test
Correlation of insulin resistance HOMA-IR with nutrients intake
Significantly correlated at *: p < 0.05
1) N (%) 2) NS: No Significant 3) MS: Metabolic Syndrome Significant difference at ***: p < 0.001
1) N (%) Significant difference at **: p < 0.01
1) N (%) Significant difference at *: p < 0.05
1) Mean ± SD 2) [Body weight (kg) / Standard weight (kg)] × 100 3) Body fat (%) measured by Inbody 720 4) Muscle mass (kg) calculated by Heymsfield's formular 5) Body muscle (%) = [Muscle (kg) / body weight (kg)] * 100 abc means significant difference (p < 0.05) among groups by Duncan's multiple range test All data are same after controlling for age using ANCOVA among groups
1) Mean ± SD abc means significant difference at p < 0.05 among groups by Duncan's multiple range test All data are same after controlling for age using ANCOVA among groups
1) % IBW = [body weight (kg) / standard weight (cm)] × 100 2) Body fat (%) = measured by inbody 720 3) Muscle mass (kg) was calculated by Heymsfield's formular Significant difference at ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD abc means significant difference at p < 0.05 among groups by Duncan's multiple range test
1) Mean ± SD No significant difference except Vit E among obese groups by Duncan's multiple range test
Significantly correlated at *: p < 0.05