Department of Food & Nutrition, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)
For items 1-7, the higher score showed the more favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables
For items 8-20, the higher score showed the less favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables
2) Mean ± SE
3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
4) Total score of 20 items (possible score: 20-80). To calculate the total score, the items of 8-20 were scored reversely
***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). The higher score showed the higher self-efficacy
2) Mean ± SE
3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
4) Total score of 10 items (possible score: 10 - 40)
N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test, 1) no response: 1
2) Total score of 15 items (possible score: 15 - 45). Each item was measured by 3-point scales ranging from 1 (0 - 2days/week) to 3 (6 - 7days/week). To calculate the total score, the items from 12 to 15 were scored reversely
3) Mean ± SE, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA. Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
N (%)
***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) Mean ± SE, 2) no response: 1, 3) no response: 7
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA
1) Mean ± SE. Frequency of eating vegetables per day based on a serving size (Korean Nutrition Society 2010)
2) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
N (%)
1) Subjects were asked to choose five vegetables from 30 vegetable items
N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)
For items 1-7, the higher score showed the more favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables
For items 8-20, the higher score showed the less favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables
2) Mean ± SE
3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
4) Total score of 20 items (possible score: 20-80). To calculate the total score, the items of 8-20 were scored reversely
***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). The higher score showed the higher self-efficacy
2) Mean ± SE
3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
4) Total score of 10 items (possible score: 10 - 40)
N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test, 1) no response: 1
2) Total score of 15 items (possible score: 15 - 45). Each item was measured by 3-point scales ranging from 1 (0 - 2days/week) to 3 (6 - 7days/week). To calculate the total score, the items from 12 to 15 were scored reversely
3) Mean ± SE, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA. Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
N (%) ***: p < 0.001 by t-test 1) Mean ± SE, 2) no response: 1, 3) no response: 7
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA 1) Mean ± SE. Frequency of eating vegetables per day based on a serving size (Korean Nutrition Society 2010) 2) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test
N (%) 1) Subjects were asked to choose five vegetables from 30 vegetable items
N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA 1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) For items 1-7, the higher score showed the more favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables For items 8-20, the higher score showed the less favorable beliefs regarding eating vegetables 2) Mean ± SE 3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test 4) Total score of 20 items (possible score: 20-80). To calculate the total score, the items of 8-20 were scored reversely
***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA 1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). The higher score showed the higher self-efficacy 2) Mean ± SE 3) Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test 4) Total score of 10 items (possible score: 10 - 40)
N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test, 1) no response: 1 2) Total score of 15 items (possible score: 15 - 45). Each item was measured by 3-point scales ranging from 1 (0 - 2days/week) to 3 (6 - 7days/week). To calculate the total score, the items from 12 to 15 were scored reversely 3) Mean ± SE, ***: p < 0.001 by ANOVA. Different alphabets with superscripts at the same row are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test