Objectives This study explored the community food environmental factors affecting food purchasing using a qualitative research methodology for the elderly as well as the various food environments under their socioeconomic diversity. Methods For the qualitative data collection, this study interviewed 20 elderly people aged 65 years or more, who participated in a public health program or lunch services operated by the senior welfare center in Seoul. Five dimensions, such as availability, physical accessibility, affordability, acceptability, and accommodation suggested in previous studies, were used to identify the community food environmental factors. Results The elderly participants showed overall similarities to the concepts derived from existing studies on the five dimensions of food accessibility environment. In addition, other important food accessibility environmental factors that were not present in previous studies, such as acceptability for a product of domestic origin, delivery service to home, and small-packaged food sales, were derived. On the other hand, the concept of some subjects differed depending on the household income and specifically for the physical accessibility concept. This showed that the close distance factor from a grocery store at home might not apply to older adults in low-income households in Korea. Conclusions This study found that five dimensions of the food environment suggested by previous studies could also be applied to vulnerable older adults in Korea. On the other hand, the socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and households would affect the perspectives of their local food environments differently. The findings of this study could help in the development of tools for evaluating the community food environment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Spatial Disparity of Neighborhood Food Environment by Socioeconomic Status: Application of Urban Network Analysis Taekyung Seong, Sugie Lee Land.2024; 13(6): 865. CrossRef
Development and Validation of a Perceived Community Food Accessibility Measurement Questionnaire for Korean Older Adults Jisoo Hong, Narae Yang, Kirang Kim Nutrients.2023; 15(19): 4301. CrossRef
A relationship between food environment and food insecurity in households with immigrant women residing in the Seoul metropolitan area Sung-Min Yook, Ji-Yun Hwang Journal of Nutrition and Health.2023; 56(3): 264. CrossRef
Regional Difference in the Effect of Food Accessibility and Affordability on Vegetable and Fruit Acquisition and Healthy Eating Behaviors for Older Adults Dong Eun Lee, Kirang Kim International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(22): 14973. CrossRef
Analysis of Accessibility Changes to Neighborhood Food Environment and Food Desert Phenomenon in Seoul, Korea : Focused on the High-density Areas of Low-income Older Adults Taekyung Seong, Sugie Lee Journal of Korea Planning Association.2021; 56(1): 137. CrossRef
Effects of Perceived Food Store Environment on Malnutrition and Frailty among the Food-Insecure Elderly in a Metropolitan City Yu-Mi Kim, Narae Yang, Kirang Kim Nutrients.2021; 13(7): 2392. CrossRef
Analyzing Socio-Economic and Geographical Factors that Affect the Health of the Elderly Zacharias Dermatis, Athina Lazakidou, Athanasios Anastasiou, Panagiotis Liargovas Journal of the Knowledge Economy.2021; 12(4): 1925. CrossRef
Analysis of Awareness, Knowledge, and Behavior about Food Hygiene·Safety Among the elderly Mi Sook Lee, Sim-Yeol Lee Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2021; 26(3): 200. CrossRef
Nutritional Status according to the Frailty Status of the Elderly at Home in Seo-gu, Gwangju, Korea Ye Eun Kim, Young-Ran Heo Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2021; 26(5): 382. CrossRef
OBJECTIVES The current survey environment is changing and participation rates in national nutrition surveys are decreasing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop strategies for improving the nutrition survey system in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). METHODS To develop an alternative system for conducting the KNHANES nutritional survey, we conducted focus group interviews with stakeholders of the survey, SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis, and expert reviews. In addition, spatial analysis of potential sites for conducting surveys instead of relying on household visits was performed, and the perception of nutritional surveys in the population eligible for KNHANES was evaluated. RESULTS Based on the results of the focus group interviews, SWOT analysis, and expert reviews, we propose two options for survey sites: vehicles specifically prepared for nutritional surveys and public facilities such as community service centers or public health centers. Among public facilities, community service centers were found to be more appropriate sites than public health centers because they were considered more accessible. About 90% of respondents would participate in the survey in public facilities and about 74% would in vehicles. CONCLUSIONS Conducting national nutrition surveys in specially designed vehicles and public facilities could be a viable alternative to home visits. Next, the validity of these newly proposed nutrition survey methods needs to be compared to the results of the current national nutrition survey.