Lin Jiang; Yun-Young Jung; Yeon-Kyung Lee

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.1.75

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 21(1); 2016 > Article

Research Article
Correlations Among Threshold and Assessment for Salty Taste and High-salt Dietary Behavior by Age: Lin Jiang, Yun-Young Jung, Yeon-Kyung Lee; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2016;21(1):75-83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.1.75
Published online: February 29, 2016

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

Corresponding author: Yeon-Kyung Lee. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu, 41566, Korea. Tel: (053) 950-6234, Fax: (053) 950-6229, yklee@knu.ac.kr

• Received: February 11, 2016 • Revised: February 18, 2016 • Accepted: February 25, 2016

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

144 Views
2 Download
4 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES

Abstract

Objectives
The purpose of this study was to analyze correlation thresholds and assessment for salty taste and high-salt dietary behaviors by age.
Methods
A total of 524 subjects including 100 each of elementary school students, middle school students, college students, and elderly as well as 124 adults were surveyed for detection and recognition thresholds, salty taste assessments, and high-salt dietary behaviors.
Results
Elementary students had a lower detection threshold (p<0.05) and recognition threshold (p<0.01) than did the other groups. Salty taste assessments were lowest among elementary students, followed by middle school students, while college students, adults, and elderly had higher assessment score (p<0.001). Elementary students had significantly lower scores for high-salt dietary behavior than did middle school students, college students, adults and elderly (p<0.001). Middle school students had higher scores for high-salt dietary behavior than did elementary school students and elderly (p<0.001) but no meaningful difference was found in dietary behavior scores between college students, adults, and elderly. There were positive correlations between high-salt dietary behavior and detection thresholds (p<0.001), recognition thresholds (p<0.001), and salty taste assessment (p<0.001). High-salt dietary behavior was more positively correlated with salty taste assessment than detection and recognition thresholds for salty taste.
Conclusions
This study suggested that salty taste assessments were positively associated with scores for the detection and recognition thresholds and high-salt dietary behavior.
Keywords: detection threshold; recognition threshold; salty taste assessment; high-salt dietary behavior

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (1462MFDS136) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 2011 and Kyungpook National Research Fund, 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Lee JH, Kim JS. Oral Physiology. 3rd ed. Seoul: Shinkwang; 1989. p. 208-231.
2. Heft MW, Robinson ME. Age differences in orofacial sensory thresholds. J Dent Res 2010; 89(10): 1102-1105.Article PubMed PMC PDF
3. Fukunaga A, Uematsu H, Sugimoto K. Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60(1): 109-113.Article PubMed
4. Wardwell L, Chapman NK, Brewer MS. Effects of age, gender and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on taste acuity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2009; 60: Supple 6. 84-97.Article PubMed
5. Park SG, Kim SH, Kee WC, Choi JK. Changes in electrical taste threshold with age in Korea. J Oral Med Pain 1998; 23(4): 327-341.
6. Lee JW, Son HJ, Shin SH, Rhyu MR, Kim JY, Ye MK. Differences in taste thresholds according to sex and age groups in Korean. Korean J Otorhinoaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2014; 57(10): 692-697.Article
7. Lucas L, Riddell L, Liem G, Whitelock S, Keast R. The influence of sodium on liking and consumption of salty food. J Food Sci 2011; 76(1): S72-S76.Article PubMed
8. Kim SH, Jang SY, Choi JK. Taste preference and whole-mouth taste threshold in a Korean population in the age of the 3rd decade. Korean J Oral Med 2003; 28(4): 413-426.
9. Yoon SC, Hur YK, Choi JK. Suprathreshold taste intensities for salt, sucrose, citric acid, and quinine HCl in elderly Korean women. Korean J Oral Med 2007; 32(4): 383-396.
10. Lee JW, Shin SH, Rhyu MR, Kim JY, Ye MK. The effect of aging on taste thresholds in Korean. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2013; 56(5): 286-290.Article
11. Kim SH, Hur YK, Choi JK. Suprathreshold taste intensities for sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, and quinine HCl in young Koreans and the influence of sex, taste preference, and smoking. Korean J Oral Med 2005; 30(2): 149-162.
12. Shin EK, Lee HJ, Ahn MY, Lee YK. Study on the development and evaluation of validity of salty taste assessment tool. Korean J Nutr 2008; 41(2): 184-191.
13. Yoon JS, Lee YK, Kwon JS, Kim HK, Ahn MS. Developing nutrition education model for reducing sodium intake and evaluation II [internet]. Development application of salty taste assessment kit. Report of Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2011; cited 2011 Nov 11]. Available from: http://report.ndsl.kr/rep Detail.do?cn=TRKO201200007080.
14. Lee YK, Shin EK, Lee HJ. Salty taste assessment tool. 2010 Patent 10-2007-0116957.
15. Lee YK, Jung YY, Jiang L. Development of computer program for salty taste assessment C-2012-010584 [internet]. 2012; cited 2012 May 31]. Available from: http://www.saltdown.com.
16. International Organization and for Standardization. Sensory analysis - Methodology - Method of investigating sensitivity of taste. 2nd ed. Geneva: 1991.
17. Kim HH, Shin EK, Lee HJ, Chun BY, Ahn MY, Lee YK. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a salt reduction program for employees. Korean J Nutr 2009; 42(4): 350-357.Article
18. Jiang L, Jung YY, Kim HS, Nam GS, Yun JS, Kim JW. A comparison of salty taste assessment, dietary attitude and dietary behavior among adult and senior women by region and by age in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2015; 20(2): 109-119.Article
19. Jiang L, Lee YK. Comparison of salty taste assessment and highsalt dietary behaviors among university students and Chinese students in Daegu, South Korea and university students in Shenyang, China. Korean J Community Nutr 2013; 18(6): 555-564.Article
20. Jung YY, Shin EK, Lee HJ, Lee NH, Chun BY, Ann MY. Development and evaluation of a nutrition education program on sodium reduction in elementary school students. Korean J Community Nutr 2009; 14(6): 746-755.
21. Kim HH, Jung YY, Lee YK. A Comparison of salty taste assessments and dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors associated with high-salt diets in four regions in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2012; 17(1): 38-48.Article
22. Verma P, Mittal S, Ghildiyal A, Chaudhary L, Mahajan KK. Salt preference: age and sex related variability. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2007; 51(1): 91-95.PubMed
23. Frye CA, Demolar GL. Menstrual cycle and sex differences influence salt preference. Physiol Behav 1994; 55(1): 193-197.Article PubMed
24. Suliburska J, Duda G, Pupek-Musialik D. Effect of tobacco smoking on taste sensitivity in adults. Przegl Lek 2004; 61(10): 1174-1176.PubMed
25. Ye MK, Han BD, Lee JW, Rhyu MR, Hyun DS, Shin SH. Relationship between taste genotype and smoking and alcohol intake. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2011; 54(12): 847-852.Article
26. Kim SH, Hur YK, Choi JK. Suprathreshold taste intensities for sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, and quinine HCl in young Koreans and the influence of sex, taste preference, and smoking. J Korean Acad Oral Med 2005; 30(2): 149-162.
27. Kim HH, Jung YY, Lee YK. A Comparison of salty taste assessments and dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors associated with high-salt diets in four regions in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2012; 17(1): 38-48.Article

Table 1

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by age groups

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Table 2

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by smoking and drug use

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

Table 3

Comparison of high-salt dietary behavior by age groups

1) Mean±SD

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test. Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 4

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, and dietary behaviors by salty taste assessment

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

ab: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Total scores of dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors were 50.

Table 5

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, high-salt dietary attitude and dietary behaviors by taste preference

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

The score of detection threshold and recognition threshold 1: 0.0175%, 2: 0.0233%, 3: 0.0350%, 4: 0.0467%, 5: 0.0701%, 6: 0.0933%, 7; 0.1403%, 8: 0.1987%, 9: 0.2631%, 10: 0.351%

Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 6

Correlation coefficients by between high-salt behavior, and detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Consumer's Preference for Bibimnaengmyeon Sauce Supplemented with Different Amounts of Watermelon Powder
Ji-U Jin, Mi-Sook Cho, Ji-Eun Oh
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2022; 51(6): 561. CrossRef
Comparison of Taste Preferences, Eating Behaviors, and Dietary Habits according to Age of the Elderly in Chungcheong-do
Eun-Sun Park, Mi-Kyeong Choi
Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2019; 29(2): 139. CrossRef
Unstimulated saliva: Background noise in taste molecules
Gilles Feron
Journal of Texture Studies.2019; 50(1): 6. CrossRef
Altered Salivary Flow, Protein Composition, and Rheology Following Taste and TRP Stimulation in Older Adults
Rose-Anna Grace Pushpass, Blánaid Daly, Charles Kelly, Gordon Proctor, Guy Howard Carpenter
Frontiers in Physiology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Correlations Among Threshold and Assessment for Salty Taste and High-salt Dietary Behavior by Age

Korean J Community Nutr. 2016;21(1):75-83. Published online February 29, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.1.75

XML Download

We recommend

Correlations Among Threshold and Assessment for Salty Taste and High-salt Dietary Behavior by Age

Table 1

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by age groups

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Table 2

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by smoking and drug use

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

Table 3

Comparison of high-salt dietary behavior by age groups

1) Mean±SD

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test. Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 4

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, and dietary behaviors by salty taste assessment

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

ab: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Total scores of dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors were 50.

Table 5

Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, high-salt dietary attitude and dietary behaviors by taste preference

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

The score of detection threshold and recognition threshold 1: 0.0175%, 2: 0.0233%, 3: 0.0350%, 4: 0.0467%, 5: 0.0701%, 6: 0.0933%, 7; 0.1403%, 8: 0.1987%, 9: 0.2631%, 10: 0.351%

Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 6

Correlation coefficients by between high-salt behavior, and detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 1 Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by age groups

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Table 2 Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment by smoking and drug use

1) Mean±SD

2) Total score of salty taste assessment is 5.

Table 3 Comparison of high-salt dietary behavior by age groups

1) Mean±SD

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test. Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 4 Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, and dietary behaviors by salty taste assessment

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

ab: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

Total scores of dietary attitudes and dietary behaviors were 50.

Table 5 Comparison of the detection threshold, recognition threshold, high-salt dietary attitude and dietary behaviors by taste preference

1) Mean±SD

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

abc: Values with the different small superscript are significantly different among subjects by Duncan's multiple range test.

The score of detection threshold and recognition threshold 1: 0.0175%, 2: 0.0233%, 3: 0.0350%, 4: 0.0467%, 5: 0.0701%, 6: 0.0933%, 7; 0.1403%, 8: 0.1987%, 9: 0.2631%, 10: 0.351%

Total score of high-salt dietary behavior is 50.

Table 6 Correlation coefficients by between high-salt behavior, and detection threshold, recognition threshold and salt taste assessment