Food and Nutrition, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1) n (%)
1) n (%) of correct answer. 2) χ2 value 3) Sum of 12 items. Possible score: 0~12. 4) Mean±SD 5) t value
*: p < 0.05
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy).
2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 12 self-efficacy items. Possible score: 12~48.
*: p < 0.05
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (dislike very much) to 4 (like very much).
2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 30 food preference items. Possible score: 30~120.
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).
2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 15 dietary behavior items. Possible score: 15~60. To calculate the total score, the items 8~12 were scored reversely.
**: p < 0.01
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
1) n (%)
1) n (%) of correct answer. 2) χ2 value 3) Sum of 12 items. Possible score: 0~12. 4) Mean±SD 5) t value *: p < 0.05
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). 2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 12 self-efficacy items. Possible score: 12~48. *: p < 0.05
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (dislike very much) to 4 (like very much). 2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 30 food preference items. Possible score: 30~120. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
1) Each item was measured by 4-point scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). 2) Mean±SD 3) Total score of 15 dietary behavior items. Possible score: 15~60. To calculate the total score, the items 8~12 were scored reversely. **: p < 0.01
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01