Hyejin Lee; Kyung-Hea Lee; Eunkyung Kim; Mi-Jung Kim; Suk-Man Hwang

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.3.290

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 17(3); 2012 > Article

Original Article
The Related Factors Influencing on Self-rated Health Level of Middle-aged Women: Hyejin Lee, Kyung-Hea Lee, Eunkyung Kim, Mi-Jung Kim, Suk-Man Hwang; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2012;17(3):290-301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.3.290
Published online: June 30, 2012

Department of Food and Nutrition, Changwon National University, Gyeongnam, Korea

¹Department of Child and Family, Changwon National University, Gyeongnam, Korea.

²Department of Food and Nutrition, Silla University, Busan, Korea.

³Department of Sociology, Changwon National University, Gyeongnam, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kyung-Hea Lee, Department of Food and Nutrition, Changwon National University, 9 Sarimdong, Uichanggu, Changwon, Gyeongnam 641-773, Korea. Tel: (055) 213-3514, Fax: (055) 281-7480, khl@changwon.ac.kr

• Received: March 19, 2012 • Revised: April 19, 2012 • Accepted: May 14, 2012

44 Views
0 Download
15 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

This survey of 836 midlife women (51.0 ± 4.0 yrs) was undertaken by exclusively a face to face interview by well-trained interviewers guarantying data collection of higher quality. This survey data was analyzed using the SPSS program. The main purpose of this study was to describe the factors affecting self-rated health status, including dietary habits and physical · mental · social factors. In the self-rated health status of a 'good' group, age was lower (p < 0.05), monthly income was higher (p < 0.01), dietary habits score (p < 0.001) and appetite (p < 0.001) and the degree of movement (p < 0.001) and life satisfaction (p < 0.001), marital intimacy (p < 0.001) and relationship satisfaction with their children (p < 0.001) were significantly higher than the 'bad' group. The level of depression (p < 0.001) and severe feeling of menopausal symptoms (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the 'poor' group. The results of correlation analysis demonstrated that educational level (r = 0.069, p < 0.05),income (r = 0.157, p < 0.001), eating habits (r = 0.235, p < 0.001), appetite (r = 0.263, p < 0.001), life satisfaction (r = 0.197, p < 0.001), marital intimacy (r = 0.167, p < 0.001), child relationship satisfaction (r = 0.149, p < 0.001), positive attitude toward menopause (r = 0.070, p < 0.05) showed a positive correlation, but depression (r = -0.122, p < 0.001) and menopausal symptoms (r = -0.292, p < 0.001) showed a negative association with self-rated health status. The predictable factors affecting the self-rated health status of middle-aged women were examined by multiple regression analysis. The 'menopausal symptoms - physical discomfort' was the most important variables followed by the 'appetite', 'eating habits', 'menopause symptoms - sensory problems', 'BMI', 'positive attitude toward menopause' and 'high marital intimacy'. These results showed that the 'appetite' and 'eating habits' are important factors affecting the self-rated health status. Therefore, a program of dietary education must be considered for the effective health education and counseling of middle-aged women.
Keywords: middle-aged women; women's health; self-rated health status; menopausal women

NOTES

This study was financially supported by the 2009 research fund(09-41) from Management Center for Health Promotion in Republic of Korea and by Changwon National University in 2011.

REFERENCES

1. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American dietetic association: food fortification and dietary supplements. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101(1): 115-125.PubMed
2. Appels A, Bosma H, Grabauskas V, Gostautas A, Strumans F. Self-rated health and mortality in a Lithuanian and Dutch population. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 42: 681-689.PubMed
3. Baek SS. An analysis of the relationship of menopausal symptoms of midwife women between urban area. J Korean Acad Womens Health Nurs. 1998; 4(3): 332-347.
4. Bailis DS, Segall A, Chipperfield JG. Two views of self-rated general health status. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56: 203-217.Article PubMed
5. Bowling A. Measuring Disease. 2001; 2nd edition. Buckingham · Philadelphia: Open University; 2-8.
6. Chang HK, Han YB. A study on the climacteric symptoms and dietary patterns in middle-aged women. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 2002; 40(1): 125-134.
7. Choi IR. Anger expression type and mental health in middle aged women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009; 39(4): 602-612.PubMed
8. Feeny D, Torrance GW, Furlong W, Goldsmith C. Health utilities index mark 3: utility scores for 74 prevalent health states. Quality Life Res. 1995; 4(5): 424.
9. Fylkesnes K, Forde OH. The tromoso study; predictors of self-evaluated health-Has society adopted the expanded health concept? Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32(2): 141-146.PubMed
10. Gander J, Lee D, Sui X, Hbert JR, Hooker SP. Self-rated health status and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of mortality in men. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45(14): 1095-1100.
11. Goodwin DK, Knol LL, Eddy JM, Fitzhugh EC, Kendrick OW, Donahue RE. The relationship between self-rated health status and the overall quality of dietary intake of US adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1450-1453.PubMed
12. Grant MD, Piotrowski ZH, Chappell R. Self-related health and survival in the logitudinal study of aging, 1984-1986. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(3): 375-387.
13. Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, van Maris B, Ross A, Franssend E, Guyatt GH, Norton PG, Dunn E. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996; 24(3): 161-175.
14. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality - A review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997; 38: 21-37.
15. Kim AK. Yangsaeng and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in middle aged women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2010; 16(3): 297-306.
16. Kim HC, Kim MR. A study on health-functional foods intake pattern of consumers in Busan and Gyeongnam area. Korean J Hum Ecol. 2006; 15(2): 341-352.
17. Kim HJ. Comparison of the level of marital intimacy according to the level of stress among middle-aged women. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2001; 5(1): 123-136.
18. Kim HS, Yoon KH, Lee MJ, Seo BH. Intake and awareness of the functional health food among housewives in Cheongju area. J Hum Ecol. 2005; 9(2): 179-196.
19. Kim MY, Han SY, Jeong JH, Kim SH, Lee JK, Park ES, Zhang XH, Seo JS. Effectiveness of nutrition-exercise education program on weight control of adult women. Korean J Community Nutr. 2009; 14(2): 168-174.
20. Koo NS, Park JY. Health states and health-related lifestyle of middle-aged people in Daejon. Korean J Diet Cult. 2001; 16(2): 137-146.
21. Kwak EK. The middle life women's menopause knowledge, attitude, symptom and management. 2006; Graduate School of KonKuk University; 7-16 MS thesis.
22. Lee JY. A study on wives' marital satisfaction and related variables. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 1987; 25(1): 105-119.
23. Lee JY, Chae SK, Kim KD. The perceptions and purchase intentions of health food consumers. Korean J Food Preserv. 2011; 18(1): 103-110.
24. Lee PS. Correlational study among anger, perceived stress and mental health status in middle aged women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003; 33(6): 856-864.
25. Lee YR, Kim MJ. A transition of health habits and self-rated health status of women aged in early adulthood. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2009; 23(2): 199-206.
26. Lobo RA, Whitehead MI. Is low-dose hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women efficacious and desirable? Climacteric. 2001; 4(2): 110-119.
27. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Pasanen M, Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(5): 517-528.
28. Mishra N, Mishra VN, Devanshi . Exercise beyond menopause: dos and dont's. J Midlife Health. 2011; 2(2): 51-56.
29. Nam BH, Lee SW. Testing the validity of the Korean SF-36 health survey. J Korean Soc Health Stat. 2003; 28(2): 3-24.
30. Oh YH, Bae HO, Kim YS. A study on physical and mental function affecting self-perceived health of older persons in Korea. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2006; 26(3): 461-476.
31. Pakzad K, Boucher BA, Kreiger N, Cotterchio M. The use of herbal and other non-vitamin, non-mineral supplements among pre- and post-menopausal women in Ontario. Can J Public Health. 2007; 98(5): 383-388.
32. Park GJ. A structure model for depression in middle-aged women. 1999; The graduate school of Ewha women's University; 44-45. 100 MS thesis.
33. Park GJ, Lee KH. A structural model for depression in middle-aged women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2002; 8(1): 69-84.
34. Park HS, Lee YM, Cho GY. A study on climacteric symptoms, knowledge of menopause, menopausal management in middle-aged women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2002; 8(4): 521-528.
35. Pyun JS, Kim MJ, Lee KH. Climacteric and menopausal women's beliefs on daily meals and food supplements-a focus group interview study-. Korean J Community Nutr. 2011; 16(2): 239-252.
36. Schleifer SJ, Keller SE, Meyerson AT, Raskin MJ, Davis L, Stein M. Lymphocyte fanction in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984; 41: 484-486.
37. Seidell JC, Bakx KC, Deurenberg P. The relation between overweight and subjective health according to age, social class, slimming behavior and smoking habits in Dutch adults. Am J Public Health. 1986; 76(12): 1410-1415.
38. Shin JM. An analysis of intake of health foods and supplements and its associated factors in middle · old aged adults living in Seoul and Kyon-gi region. 2002; Graduate School of Yonsei University; 23-42 MS thesis.
39. Smith EL, Reddan W, Smith DE. Physical activity and calcium modalties for bone mineral increase in aged women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1981; 13(1): 60-64.
40. Song AR. Health factors related to management of menopause among climacteric women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2005; 11(1): 12-19.
41. Sowers M, Zheng H, Tomey K, Karvonen-Gutierrex C, Jannausch M, Li X, Yosef M, Symons J. Changes in body composition in women over six years at midlife: ovarian and chronological aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92(3): 895-901.
42. Statistics Canada. Indicators of well-being in Canada. Human resources and skills development Canada. 2012; cited 2012 March 10. Available from http://www4.hrsdc.gc.ca/c.4nt.2nt@-eng.jsp?cid=14.
43. Svedberg P, Bardage C, Sandin S, Pedersen NL. A prospective study of health, life-style and psychosocial predictors of self-rated health. Eur J epidemiol. 2006; 21: 767-776.
44. Ware JE. Scales for measuring general health perceptions. Health Serv Res. 1976; 11(4): 396-415.
45. Ware JE Jr. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(6): 473-480.
46. Ware JE, Sherboume CD. The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care. 1992; 30(6): 473-483.
47. Yang JH. A study on health behavior experience of middle-aged women in rural area. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002; 32(5): 694-705.
48. Yoo YJ, Hong WS, Youn SJ, Choi YS. The experience of health food usage for adults in Seoul. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci. 2002; 18(2): 136-146.

Table 1

General Informations of subjects by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^*: p < 0.05: Significantly different by Student's t-test

^**: p < 0.01: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 2

Dietary related factors by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) 4-point scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Tend to well, 4: Very well)

3) 4-point scale (1: No, 2: Less, 3: Good, 4: Very well)

4) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 3

Scores of dietary habits by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 4

BMI and menopausal symptoms by self-rated health levels

1) BMI = kg/m²

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

3) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very much)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 5

Comparisons in life style by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 6

Mental health scores by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

2) 4-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 4: Always)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 7

Familial characteristics by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Common, 4: Tend to well, 5: Very well)

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not satisfied, 3: Common, 4: Tend to satisfied, 5: Very satisfied)

3) Values are Mean ± SD.

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 8

Correlation in variables with the self-rated health levels

^*: p < 0.05, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 9

Related factors influencing on self-rated health status by multiple regression analysis

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Self-rated health according to change of lifestyle after COVID-19: Differences between age groups
Dan Bi Lee, Jung Hyun Ahn, Jin Young Nam
Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion.2022; 39(2): 1. CrossRef
Role Stress and Sense of Control Predict Using Food to Cope With Stress in Midlife Women
Dana R. Riedy, Ashley MacPherson, Natalie D. Dautovich
Journal of Aging and Health.2021; 33(9): 732. CrossRef
Food consumption frequency of Korean adults based on whether or not having chewing difficulty using 2013–2016 KNHANES by sex-stratified comparative analysis
Mi Jeong Kim
Nutrition Research and Practice.2020; 14(6): 637. CrossRef
Influence of Midlife Health Condition and Awareness of Successful Aging on Preparation for Old Age
Eun Ho Ha, Young Mi Lee
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2020; 32(5): 472. CrossRef
Analysis of Convergent Factors on Subjective Health Status of Patients with Depression
Myoung-Jin Kwon, Young-Ju Kim
Journal of Digital Convergence.2016; 14(6): 309. CrossRef
Health Status Assessment Tool Development based on Dietary Patterns in Middle-Aged Women
Hye-Jin Lee, Kyung-Hea Lee
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2016; 21(1): 37. CrossRef
Acculturation, Food Intake and Dietary Behaviors of Chinese College Students in Busan by Residential Period
Fangfang Song, Mi Jeong Kim
Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2015; 25(4): 594. CrossRef
The Impacts of Dietary Habits on Self-perceived Health-related Physical Fitness in Middle-aged Women -Focused on Changwon Province-
Hye-Jin Lee, Kyung-Hea Lee
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2014; 43(6): 916. CrossRef
Effects of Cultural Facilities and City Parks on the Regional Suicide Rates in Korea
Soo-Mi Cho, Hyung-Deok Shin
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2014; 15(8): 4874. CrossRef
A Study on Dietary Behaviors, Health-Related Lifestyle of Adult Visitors at Public Health Centers in Gyeonggi Urban Area
Jong-Sook Kwon, Kyungmin Kim, Hyun-Chang Seo, Yoonna Lee, Seunggeon Lim, Young-Sug Choi
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2013; 18(6): 611. CrossRef
A Study on the Knowledge, Attitudes, Cancer Preventive Dietary Behavior, and Lifestyles of Adults in the Jeonbuk Area
Jeongok Rho, Suyoun Choi
Korean Journal of Human Ecology.2013; 22(1): 201. CrossRef
Evaluation of Diet Quality according to Self-Rated Health Status of Korean Middle-Aged Women -Based on 2008~2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-
Hye-Jin Lee, Kyung-Hea Lee
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.2013; 42(9): 1395. CrossRef
Anthropometric Index, Dietary Habits and Nutrient Intake of the Oldest-old Population Aged 95 and Over Living in Seoul
Chung Shil Kwak, Ji Hyun Cho, Miyong Yon, Sang Chul Park
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2012; 17(5): 603. CrossRef
Health-Related Factors Influencing the Quality of Life of Rural Elderly Subjects - Activities of Daily Living, Cognitive Functions, Prevalence of Chronic Diseases and Nutritional Assessment
Mee Sook Lee
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2012; 17(6): 772. CrossRef
Characteristics of the Health Factors in 45~60 Year Old Korean Women related to Menopausal Stages - Based on 2008~2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey -
Hye-Jin Lee, Kwang-Hyun Cho, Kyung-Hea Lee
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2012; 17(4): 450. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Related Factors Influencing on Self-rated Health Level of Middle-aged Women

Korean J Community Nutr. 2012;17(3):290-301. Published online June 30, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.3.290

XML Download

We recommend

The Related Factors Influencing on Self-rated Health Level of Middle-aged Women

Table 1

General Informations of subjects by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^*: p < 0.05: Significantly different by Student's t-test

^**: p < 0.01: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 2

Dietary related factors by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) 4-point scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Tend to well, 4: Very well)

3) 4-point scale (1: No, 2: Less, 3: Good, 4: Very well)

4) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 3

Scores of dietary habits by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 4

BMI and menopausal symptoms by self-rated health levels

1) BMI = kg/m²

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

3) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very much)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 5

Comparisons in life style by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 6

Mental health scores by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

2) 4-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 4: Always)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 7

Familial characteristics by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Common, 4: Tend to well, 5: Very well)

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not satisfied, 3: Common, 4: Tend to satisfied, 5: Very satisfied)

3) Values are Mean ± SD.

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 8

Correlation in variables with the self-rated health levels

^*: p < 0.05, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 9

Related factors influencing on self-rated health status by multiple regression analysis

Table 1 General Informations of subjects by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^*: p < 0.05: Significantly different by Student's t-test

^**: p < 0.01: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 2 Dietary related factors by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) 4-point scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Tend to well, 4: Very well)

3) 4-point scale (1: No, 2: Less, 3: Good, 4: Very well)

4) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 3 Scores of dietary habits by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 4 BMI and menopausal symptoms by self-rated health levels

1) BMI = kg/m²

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

3) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very much)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 5 Comparisons in life style by self-rated health levels

1) Values are Mean ± SD.

2) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 6 Mental health scores by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 5: Very well)

2) 4-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 4: Always)

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 7 Familial characteristics by self-rated health levels

1) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not well, 3: Common, 4: Tend to well, 5: Very well)

2) 5-point Likert scale (1: Not at all, 2: Tend to not satisfied, 3: Common, 4: Tend to satisfied, 5: Very satisfied)

3) Values are Mean ± SD.

^***: p < 0.001: Significantly different by Student's t-test

Table 8 Correlation in variables with the self-rated health levels

^*: p < 0.05, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 9 Related factors influencing on self-rated health status by multiple regression analysis