1Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
2Nutrition Team, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
3Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea.
Copyright © 2011 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (2010-0017210).
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Missing number: 2
2) Mean ± SD, The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0 - 2 days/week) to 3 (6 - 7 days/week) and the items of 2, 10 - 14 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 15 - 45
3) †††: p < 0.001 by paired t-test (before and after diagnosis)
General characteristics of the subjects
1) FBG: fasting blood glucose, n = 70, 2) n = 89
3) Mean ± SD, 4) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test or χ2-test
Comparison of nutrition knowledge about diabetes mellitus
1) %, Percentages of correct answers
2) Mean ± SD, Correct answer was given 1 point. The possible total score: 0 - 15
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
Status of self-management and nutrition education of the subjects
1) Subjects were asked to choose multiple responses
2) Asked only to those who were experienced nutrition education
3) Number of data
4) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 by χ2-test
Attitudes about diabetes mellitus of the subjects
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very disagree) - 5 (very agree)
*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
Comparison of eating behaviors before and after diagnosed diabetes (%)
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Missing number: 2
2) Mean ± SD, The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0 - 2 days/week) to 3 (6 - 7 days/week) and the items of 2, 10 - 14 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 15 - 45
3) †††: p < 0.001 by paired t-test (before and after diagnosis)
Preferred topics and needs for design in nutrition information contents (websites)
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested)
2) Number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
Preferred substances and needs for design in nutrition management program
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested)
2) number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%)
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) FBG: fasting blood glucose, n = 70, 2) n = 89 3) Mean ± SD, 4) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test or χ2-test
1) %, Percentages of correct answers 2) Mean ± SD, Correct answer was given 1 point. The possible total score: 0 - 15 *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Subjects were asked to choose multiple responses 2) Asked only to those who were experienced nutrition education 3) Number of data 4) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 by χ2-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very disagree) - 5 (very agree) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test 1) Missing number: 2 2) Mean ± SD, The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0 - 2 days/week) to 3 (6 - 7 days/week) and the items of 2, 10 - 14 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 15 - 45 3) †††: p < 0.001 by paired t-test (before and after diagnosis)
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested) 2) Number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested) 2) number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%) **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test