1Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
2Nutrition Team, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
3Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea.
Copyright © 2011 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
1) FBG: fasting blood glucose, n = 70, 2) n = 89
3) Mean ± SD, 4) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test or χ2-test
1) %, Percentages of correct answers
2) Mean ± SD, Correct answer was given 1 point. The possible total score: 0 - 15
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Subjects were asked to choose multiple responses
2) Asked only to those who were experienced nutrition education
3) Number of data
4) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 by χ2-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very disagree) - 5 (very agree)
*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Missing number: 2
2) Mean ± SD, The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0 - 2 days/week) to 3 (6 - 7 days/week) and the items of 2, 10 - 14 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 15 - 45
3) †††: p < 0.001 by paired t-test (before and after diagnosis)
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested)
2) Number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested)
2) number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%)
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) FBG: fasting blood glucose, n = 70, 2) n = 89 3) Mean ± SD, 4) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test or χ2-test
1) %, Percentages of correct answers 2) Mean ± SD, Correct answer was given 1 point. The possible total score: 0 - 15 *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test
1) Subjects were asked to choose multiple responses 2) Asked only to those who were experienced nutrition education 3) Number of data 4) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 by χ2-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very disagree) - 5 (very agree) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by χ2-test or t-test 1) Missing number: 2 2) Mean ± SD, The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0 - 2 days/week) to 3 (6 - 7 days/week) and the items of 2, 10 - 14 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 15 - 45 3) †††: p < 0.001 by paired t-test (before and after diagnosis)
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested) 2) Number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test
1) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 3-point scales ranging from 1 (not interested) - 3 (interested) 2) number of data. Subjects were asked to choose three responses, 3) N (%) **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 by t-test