1Department of Food and Nutrition, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea.
2Nutrition Counseling Center, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea.
3Daejeon Dong-gu Center for Children's Food Service Management, Daejeon, Korea.
Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1) PIBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart, 2) Obesity rate: (actual weight-standard weight)*100/standard weight; standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) BMI in 1998 growth chart, 4) 1999 growth chart, 5) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1998 growth chart, 6) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 7) The most proper responses were scored 2 and the least one 0, 8) 5-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 9) 5-point Likert scale (5 for ‘strongly agree’ to 1 for ‘strongly disagree), 10) 5-year follow up from 1st grade to 5th grade in elementary school, 11) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group
1) PlBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; NAR, nutrient adequacy ratio; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart; Obesity rate, actual weight/standard weight, 2) 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group, underweight and normal to normal group, 4) Standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 5) 1999 growth chart, 6) 1998 growth chart, 7) 15-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 8) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group
1) N (%)
1) N (%)
1) N (%)
1) PIBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart, 2) Obesity rate: (actual weight-standard weight)*100/standard weight; standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) BMI in 1998 growth chart, 4) 1999 growth chart, 5) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1998 growth chart, 6) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 7) The most proper responses were scored 2 and the least one 0, 8) 5-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 9) 5-point Likert scale (5 for ‘strongly agree’ to 1 for ‘strongly disagree), 10) 5-year follow up from 1st grade to 5th grade in elementary school, 11) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group
1) PIBW, percentage of ideal body weight
2) 5-point Likert scale (5 for ‘strongly agree’ to 1 for ‘strongly disagree’)
3) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart
1) PlBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; NAR, nutrient adequacy ratio; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart; Obesity rate, actual weight/standard weight, 2) 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group, underweight and normal to normal group, 4) Standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 5) 1999 growth chart, 6) 1998 growth chart, 7) 15-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 8) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group
1) N (%)
1) N (%)
1) N (%)
1) PIBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart, 2) Obesity rate: (actual weight-standard weight)*100/standard weight; standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) BMI in 1998 growth chart, 4) 1999 growth chart, 5) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1998 growth chart, 6) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 7) The most proper responses were scored 2 and the least one 0, 8) 5-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 9) 5-point Likert scale (5 for ‘strongly agree’ to 1 for ‘strongly disagree), 10) 5-year follow up from 1st grade to 5th grade in elementary school, 11) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group
1) PIBW, percentage of ideal body weight 2) 5-point Likert scale (5 for ‘strongly agree’ to 1 for ‘strongly disagree’) 3) 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart
1) PlBW, percent of ideal body weight; BMI, body mass index; NAR, nutrient adequacy ratio; WHP, weight/height index expressed as the percentage of the median of the growth chart; Obesity rate, actual weight/standard weight, 2) 50th percentiles of weight for age in 2007 children and adolescent standard growth chart, 3) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group, underweight and normal to normal group, 4) Standard weight: 50th percentiles of weight for height in 1985 growth chart, 5) 1999 growth chart, 6) 1998 growth chart, 7) 15-grade fat mass for age 1998 standard, 8) Depending on the anthropometry assessment, overweight and obese children was classified to obese group