Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 10
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test
3) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test
5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 5
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test
3) **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test
5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
Anthropometric measurements of the subjects
1) Mean ± SD
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test
3) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
4) BMI: Body Mass Index = Weight (kg) / Height (m)2
5) SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure, 6) DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure
General characteristics of the subjects
1) N (%), 2) ***: p < 0.001
Comparison of salty taste assessment among regions
1) Mean ± SD, 1: unsalty, 2: slightly unsalty, 3: so-so, 4: slightly salty, 5: salty
2) NS: Not significant
3) *: p < 0.05
4) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
Comparison of nutrition knowledge by salty taste assessment among regions
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 10
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test
3) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test
5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
Comparison of eating attitude by salty taste assessment among regions
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 5
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test
3) **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test
5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
Comparison of eating behavior by salty taste assessment among regions
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 5
2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test
3) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
4) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
Correlation matrix between sodium intake and variables
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Correlation coefficients among nutrition knowledge, salty taste assessment, eating attitudes, and eating behavior
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD 2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test 3) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001 4) BMI: Body Mass Index = Weight (kg) / Height (m)2 5) SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure, 6) DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure
1) N (%), 2) ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD, 1: unsalty, 2: slightly unsalty, 3: so-so, 4: slightly salty, 5: salty 2) NS: Not significant 3) *: p < 0.05 4) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 10 2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test 3) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test 5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out 6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 5 2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test 3) **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 4) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by Duncan's multiple range test 5) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out 6) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different areas by ANCOVA & Bonferroni comparison test
1) Mean ± SD, Total score = 5 2) Values with the different superscript are significantly different among different concentration by Duncan's multiple range test 3) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001 4) Adjusted for age, gender, job, frequency of eating out and expenditure of eating out
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001