Mooju Middle School, Jeonbuk, Korea.
1Department of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.
Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This research was supported by 2012 KNUE research grants from Korea National University of Education.
1) Ministry of Health & Welfare et al. 2010
2) Mean ± SD
3) N (%)
Dietary life related characteristics of the participants
1) N (%)
2) Multiple choice
Evaluation of energy content in the menu plan based on the estimated energy requirement in the Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans1)
1) Ministry of Health & Welfare et al. 2010
2) Mean ± SD
3) N (%)
Energy content and energy contribution ratio of the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100
***: P < 0.001
Evaluation of energy contribution ratio of carbohydrate, protein, and fat in the menu plan based on AMDR
1) N (%)
The mineral and vitamin content of the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100
*: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001
The mineral and vitamin content of the menu plan by the kind of dishes
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean
2) Mean ± SD
3) %
NAR and percentage of recommended intake of calcium and folate in the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) N (%)
***: P < 0.001
Index of nutrient quality(INQ) of the menu plan by the kind of dishes
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean
2) Mean ± SD
1) N (%) 2) Multiple choice
1) 2) Mean ± SD 3) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD 2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100 ***: P < 0.001
1) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD 2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100 *: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean 2) Mean ± SD 3) %
1) Mean ± SD 2) N (%) ***: P < 0.001
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean 2) Mean ± SD