Mooju Middle School, Jeonbuk, Korea.
1Department of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.
Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Dietary life related characteristics of the participants
1) N (%)
2) Multiple choice
Evaluation of energy content in the menu plan based on the estimated energy requirement in the Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans1)
1) Ministry of Health & Welfare et al. 2010
2) Mean ± SD
3) N (%)
Energy content and energy contribution ratio of the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100
***: P < 0.001
Evaluation of energy contribution ratio of carbohydrate, protein, and fat in the menu plan based on AMDR
1) N (%)
The mineral and vitamin content of the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100
*: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001
The mineral and vitamin content of the menu plan by the kind of dishes
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean
2) Mean ± SD
3) %
NAR and percentage of recommended intake of calcium and folate in the menu plan
1) Mean ± SD
2) N (%)
***: P < 0.001
Index of nutrient quality(INQ) of the menu plan by the kind of dishes
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean
2) Mean ± SD
1) N (%) 2) Multiple choice
1) 2) Mean ± SD 3) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD 2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100 ***: P < 0.001
1) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD 2) CV (%) = (SD / Mean) × 100 *: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean 2) Mean ± SD 3) %
1) Mean ± SD 2) N (%) ***: P < 0.001
1) Meat · fish · egg · bean 2) Mean ± SD