Young-Won Jang; Jian Ma; Yeon-Kyung Lee

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2024.29.3.189

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 29(3); 2024 > Article

Research Article
Relationship of sodium index with the obesity indicators of university students in Daegu, South Korea: a cross-sectional study: Young-Won Jang¹, Jian Ma¹, Yeon-Kyung Lee^2,†; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2024;29(3):189-198.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2024.29.3.189
Published online: June 30, 2024

¹Student, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

²Professor, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

†Corresponding author: Yeon-Kyung Lee Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea. Tel: +82-53-950-6234 Fax: +82-53-650-6229 Email: yklee@knu.ac.kr

• Received: February 16, 2024 • Revised: April 14, 2024 • Accepted: April 22, 2024

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1,225 Views
26 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Objectives
The sodium index is an index that converts the estimated sodium intake calculated using a verified and reliable sodium estimation formula. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the sodium index and obesity indicators and the potential impact of excessive sodium consumption on obesity.
Methods
Obesity indicators, such as body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and visceral fat levels, were analyzed in 120 university students (60 men and 60 women). The sodium index was calculated by indexing the estimated sodium intake according to age, sex, BMI, salt-eating habits, and salt-eating behaviors. The relationship between sodium index and obesity indicators was analyzed using multiple logistic regression.
Results
The estimated sodium intake was 3,907.1 mg, with 76.7% of the participants categorized under the “careful” level of sodium index and 10.8% under the “moderate” level. As the sodium index increased, the BMI, body fat percentage, WHR, and visceral fat levels significantly increased. All obesity indicators significantly increased in patients with a “severe” sodium index than in those with a “moderate” sodium index. In addition, a strong positive correlation was identified between obesity indicators and sodium index. When the “severe” sodium index was compared with the “moderate” sodium index, the risk of obesity based on body fat percentage increased by 2.181 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.526–3.118), while the risk of obesity based on visceral fat level increased by 4.073 times (95% CI, 2.097–7.911).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest a correlation between excessive sodium intake and obesity. Moreover, the sodium index can be used to determine sodium intake.
Keywords: sodium index; obesity; body mass index; body fat; waist-hip ratio; visceral fat

INTRODUCTION

According to the World Health Organization, 43% of adults worldwide were overweight and 16% were obese in 2022 [1]. Obesity is associated with numerous health conditions such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cancer, and respiratory disorders [2-5]. A 5 kg increase in weight corresponds to an approximately 5% increased risk of developing colon cancer [6], while a higher the body mass index (BMI) increases the likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes [7]. The prevalence of obesity in South Korea increased from 31.8% (37.7% in men and 25.1% in women) in 2013 to 37.2% (47.7% in men and 25.7% in women) in 2022 [8]. Abdominal obesity, determined by waist circumference, increased by 12% to 39.4% in 2019 compared with that in 2007 [9].

Abdominal obesity is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease and diabetes; even in individuals with a BMI of 25 kg/m², a high waist circumference (> 102 cm in men and > 88 cm in women) correlates with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes [10]. Among Asians, those with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m² had a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [11]. According to a 2020 report from Mexico, body fat mass was more strongly associated with type 2 diabetes than BMI [12].

The daily average sodium intake of Koreans decreased from 4,789.2 mg in 2010 to 3,030.2 mg in 2022. However, it is still more than twice the recommended intake level [8,13]. Excessive sodium intake has been shown to increase the risk of diseases, such as hypertension, stroke, cardiovascular disease, and gastric cancer [14-17].

Excessive sodium intake has been consistently linked to an increased risk of obesity in both domestic and international studies. Higher sodium intake was associated with higher BMI, waist circumference, abdominal computed tomography, and visceral fat mass [18-20]. A study conducted in the United Kingdom revealed that the group with a higher 24-hour urinary sodium excretion had an increased risk of obesity compared with the group with a lower excretion [21]. In a study conducted on Spanish adults, the group with a higher 24-hour urinary sodium excretion had a higher BMI than the group with a lower excretion [22]. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the United States, sodium intake is independently correlated with being overweight and obesity [23]. Moreover, an analysis using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on sodium density and obesity revealed that sodium intake was a risk factor for obesity, regardless of calorie intake [24]. Additionally, Nam et al. [25] showed that individuals in the highest quartile of 24-hour urinary sodium concentration had a higher risk of obesity compared with the remaining participants.

Although previous studies have examined the relationship between sodium intake, 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, and obesity, no study has analyzed the association between the sodium index and obesity indicators. The sodium index is derived from the estimated sodium intake, calculated using a validated and reliable regression equation, and it was developed by analyzing the 24-hour dietary intake and 24-hour urinary sodium excretion data from various population groups across 4 regions of South Korea [26].

This study aimed to investigate the sodium index in university students and measure the obesity-related indicators to analyze the correlation between sodium intake and obesity. We aimed to evaluate the potential utility of sodium index as a tool for assessing sodium intake.

METHODS

Ethics statement

Obtainment of informed consent was exempted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kyungpook National University (approval number: IRB No. 2018-O146)

1. Study subjects

The study included university students residing in the Daegu area recruited through the university website and social networking service channels. A total of 120 participants (60 men and 60 women) were enrolled. A sodium index survey was conducted using an online questionnaire from October 1 to 31, 2018. Body composition measurements, including body fat analysis, were performed during onsite visits from October 23 to 31, 2018.

2. Anthropometrics

Body measurements were performed on the study participants using a body composition analyzer (Inbody XBIA 900; JW, Soeul, Korea) to assess weight, BMI, body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and visceral fat level. BMI was classified as follows according to the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity and the World Health Organization Asia-Pacific Region Obesity guidelines [27]: < 18.5 as underweight, 18.5–22.9 as normal, 23–24.9 as overweight, and ≥ 25 as obesity. Additionally, obesity based on body fat percentage was classified based on the modified version of the criteria used in Lee and Nieman’s study [28] and established by the Korean Society for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention [29]. In men, body fat percentages of < 8% indicate underweight; 8%–15%, moderate; > 15% and < 25%, overfat; and ≥ 25%, obesity. In women, body fat percentages of < 15% indicate underweight; 15%–25%, moderate; > 25% and < 30%, overfat; and ≥ 30%, obesity.

3. Sodium index survey

The sodium index was calculated using the method described by Lee et al. [26]. The participants’ sex, age, BMI, salt-eating habits, and dietary behaviors were surveyed, and sodium intake was estimated using a regression equation, which was then converted into the sodium index.

To assess salty-eating habits, the participants were asked about their tendency to consume salty foods, and their responses were rated as follows: “eat unsalty,” 10 points; “eat slightly unsalty,” 20 points; “eat neither unsalty nor salty,” 30 points; “eat slightly salty,” 40 points; and “eat salty,” 50 points.

A questionnaire was used to evaluate salty dietary behavior, which comprised 3 items regarding salty-eating behavior, 2 items regarding sodium reduction behavior, 3 items regarding the frequency of salty food intake, and 2 items regarding the frequency of low-sodium food intake. The participants’ dietary behavior was rated as follows: “not at all,” 2 points; “slightly,” 4 points; “moderately,” 6 points; “very,” 8 points; and “extremely,” 10 points. Meanwhile, the food intake frequency scores were as follows: 3 times a month, 2 points; 1–2 times a week, 4 points; 3–6 times a week, 6 points; once a day, 8 points; and 2–3 times a day, 10 points. Conversely, the scoring system for sodium reduction behaviors and low-sodium food intake frequencies was reversed.

Sodium Intake Estimation Regression Equation = −191.9 + (−705.2 × Sex¹⁾) + (189.6 × G_age²⁾) + (130.6 × BMI) + (24.2 × Eating Habit³⁾) + (18.5 × Dietary Behavior⁴⁾)

¹⁾1 = men, 2 = women; ²⁾1 = 19–29, 2 = 30–39, 3 = 40–49, 4 = 50–59, 5 = 60–69;

³⁾10 = unsalty, 20 = slightly unsalty, 30 = neither unsalty nor salty, 40 = slightly salty, 50 = salty;

⁴⁾20–100 of a total of 10 items.

The criteria used for evaluating the sodium index were as follows:

The estimated sodium intake of 1,500 to < 2,000 mg: 75 to < 100 points was rated as “very moderate,” 2,000 to < 3,000 mg: 100 to < 150 points as “moderate,” < 1,500 mg or 3,000 to < 5,000 mg: < 75 points or 150 to < 250 points as “careful,” and ≥ 5,000 mg: ≥ 250 points as “severe.”

4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 27 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The significant differences in obesity indicators, estimated sodium intake, and sodium index according to sex were assessed using t-tests and χ² analyses. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the obesity indicators across quartiles of the sodium index and to assess the sodium index across levels of obesity indicators, followed by Duncan’s multiple range test for post-hoc analysis. The significance level for all items was set at a P-value of < 0.05. The correlation between obesity indicators and the sodium index was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for age and sex, to examine the relationship between sodium index and obesity indicators.

RESULTS

1. Obesity indicators and sodium index

Table 1 discusses the participants’ body measurements and sodium indices. The mean BMI was 22.6 kg/m² (obesity rate: 21.7%), the mean body fat percentage was 23.6% (obesity rate: 23.3%), the mean WHR was 0.79, and the mean visceral fat level was 6.25. Body fat percentage was higher in female students than in male students (P < 0.001), while the BMI, WHR, and visceral fat levels were higher in male students than in female students (all P < 0.001).

The estimated mean sodium intake was 3,907.1 mg, with male students (4,470.8 mg) having a higher intake than female students (3,343.4 mg) (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean sodium index was 195.3, which was higher in male students (223.5) than in female students (167.1) (P < 0.001). The distribution of sodium index showed that 76.7% of the total participants were at the “careful” level. Among male students, none showed a “moderate” level, 78.3% demonstrated a “careful” level, and 21.7% reached a “severe” level. These results were higher than the percentages observed among female students (“careful”: 75.9%, “severe”: 1.7%; P < 0.001).

2. Salty-eating habits and dietary behaviors

Table 2 discusses the survey results related to the salt-eating habits and dietary behaviors of the study participants. Among the salty-eating behavior items (total score: 10), the item “How often do you eat salted dry fish as a side dish?” obtained the lowest score (2.58), indicating the infrequent consumption of salted fish among university students. Additionally, the item “I check the sodium content when I buy processed foods” obtained a score of 8.27, suggesting that a high proportion of students did not check the sodium content. Conversely, the items “I ask them to cook blandly when I eat out” (8.95) and “How often do you eat nuts for a snack?” (9.03) obtained higher scores, implying rare requests for less salty options when dining out and the infrequent consumption of nuts as snacks. No significant differences were observed in the eating habits or dietary behaviors between male and female students.

3. Comparison of obesity indicators by quartiles of sodium index

Table 3 lists a comparison of obesity indicators according to the quartiles of sodium. BMI, WHR, and visceral fat level showed significant differences across all quartiles (from Q1 to Q4). This finding suggests that BMI, WHR, and visceral fat levels increased as the sodium index increased (P < 0.05). With regard to body fat percentage, Q4 (26.92%) was significantly higher than Q1–Q3 (P < 0.05).

4. Comparison of obesity indicators by sodium index level

Figure 1 depicts a comparison of obesity indicators according to sodium index level. The group with a “moderate” sodium index level demonstrated significantly lower BMI, WHR, and visceral fat levels compared with the group that reached “careful” and “severe” levels (P < 0.05). Body fat percentage was significantly higher in the “severe” group than in the “moderate” and “careful” groups (P < 0.05).

5. Comparison of sodium index by obesity indicators

Table 4 discusses the results of the comparison of sodium index according to the degree of obesity based on BMI and body fat percentage. Based on the BMI classification, the mean sodium index for underweight participants was 145.6, which significantly increased to 179.5 for normal-weight participants, 205.0 for overweight participants, and 246.5 for obese participants (P < 0.05). The same trend was observed in both male and female students.

Based on the body fat percentage classification, the sodium index for the moderate category was 158.3, which was significantly lower than 197.1 for the overfat category and 239.5 for the obesity category (P < 0.05). Similarly, this trend was observed in both male and female students.

6. Correlation between sodium index and obesity indicators

Table 5 discusses the results of the correlation analysis between sodium index and obesity indicators. The sodium index showed a high positive correlation with BMI (P < 0.001), body fat percentage (P < 0.01), WHR (P < 0.001), and visceral fat level (P < 0.001); the same trend was observed for both male and female students.

7. Relationship of sodium index with obesity indicators

The results of the analysis of the effect of sodium index on obesity indicators before and after adjusting for confounding variables are represented in Table 6. Using the “moderate” sodium index level corresponding to an estimated sodium intake of 2,000 to < 3,000 mg as a reference, participants who reached the “careful” (3,000 to < 5,000 mg) and “severe” (≥ 5,000 mg) levels had 1.253 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.055–1.487) and 2.181 times (95% CI, 1.526–3.118) higher risk of developing obesity based on the body fat percentage, respectively. Additionally, compared with those with a “moderate” sodium index level, participants who reached the “careful” and “severe” levels had 1.468 times (95% CI, 1.012–2.128) and 4.073 times (95% CI, 2.097–7.911) higher risk of developing obesity based on the visceral fat level, respectively.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the potential impact of excessive sodium intake on obesity among university students by analyzing the relationship between sodium index and obesity indicators (BMI, body fat percentage, WHR, and visceral fat level). A strong correlation was observed between the sodium index and obesity indicators. Compared with individuals with a “moderate” sodium index level, those with a “severe” level had 2-fold and 4-fold higher risks of developing obesity based on the body fat percentage and visceral fat level, respectively. This underscores the association between higher sodium intake and an increased likelihood of obesity.

Epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated that excessive sodium intake is associated with triglyceride level, blood glucose level, waist circumference, body fat percentage, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance [30,31]. Additionally, a previous study that examined the relationship between sodium intake and obesity in adults reported that weight, BMI, and total energy intake significantly increased in both men and women as sodium intake increased [32]. Moreover, an experimental study on the obesity pathogenesis of a high-sodium diet in rats revealed that higher sodium intake increases fat synthesis in the liver and fat accumulation in both the liver and adipose tissue, thereby reducing heat generation and increasing the risk of obesity [33].

In our study, the sodium index developed by analyzing the 24-hour dietary intake and 24-hour urinary sodium excretion showed significant correlations with BMI, body fat percentage, WHR, and visceral fat levels. This observation suggests that higher estimated sodium intake or excessive sodium consumption increases the risk of developing obesity. This result supports the findings of previous studies, which indicated that higher 24-hour urinary sodium excretion is associated with an increased risk of abdominal obesity [20]. When the sodium index was divided into quartiles, individuals in the top 25% of the sodium index had higher obesity indicators than those in the bottom 25%. Given that a higher sodium index corresponds to a greater probability of obesity, it could serve as a tool for assessing sodium intake.

However, this study has certain limitations. The study only evaluated 120 university students from one region, and the distribution of obesity among the participants was not even.

Previous studies have demonstrated the significance of sodium reduction in preventing obesity and diabetes, managing hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and other conditions, thus reducing healthcare costs [34,35]. Therefore, to establish low-salt eating habits and prevent obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and other chronic diseases, the sodium index should be utilized. As excessive sodium intake affects the development of obesity and chronic diseases, promoting low-salt eating habits for obesity prevention and management is essential. This approach can improve individual quality of life and reduce social costs and medical expenses associated with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

A study conducted among 120 university students in Daegu, South Korea reported a high correlation between the sodium index and obesity indicators (BMI, body fat percentage, WHR, and visceral fat level). Specifically, as the sodium index increased, all obesity indicators increased significantly. At the “severe” sodium index level, the risk of obesity determined by body fat percentage was 2.181 times higher, and the risk of obesity determined by visceral fat level was 4.073 times higher compared with that at the “moderate” level. These results confirm that excessive sodium intake increases the risk of obesity and suggest that the sodium index could serve as a useful tool for assessing sodium intake levels in individuals.

NOTES

Conflict of Interest

There are no financial or other issues that might lead to conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of obesity index according to sodium index. (A) Body mass index; (B) Body fat percentage; (C) Waist-to-hip ratio; (D) Visceral fat. Bars indicate the mean ± standard error. Means with different lower case letters in the same column are significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

Table 1.

Obesity indicators and sodium index of participants

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)	P-value
Age (years)	23.6 ± 2.2	24.1 ± 2.1	23.2 ± 2.2	0.026
Body mass index (kg/m²)	22.6 ± 3.3	24.1 ± 3.3	21.1 ± 3.3	< 0.001
Obesity (%)	26 (21.7)	21 (35.0)	5 (8.3)	< 0.001
Body fat percentage (%)	23.6 ± 5.8	21.8 ± 5.8	25.4 ± 5.3	0.001
Obesity (%)	28 (23.3)	19 (31.7)	9 (15.0)	< 0.001
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.79 ± 0.06	0.82 ± 0.05	0.75 ± 0.05	< 0.001
Visceral fat level	6.25 ± 3.24	7.98 ± 2.49	4.52 ± 2.97	< 0.001
Estimated sodium intake (mg/d)	3,907.1 ± 821.3	4,470.8 ± 597.8	3,343.4 ± 597.3	< 0.001
Sodium index	195.3 ± 41.0	223.5 ± 29.8	167.1 ± 29.8	< 0.001
Very moderate	1 (0.8)	0 (0.0)	1 (1.7)	< 0.001
Moderate	13 (10.8)	0 (0.0)	13 (21.7)
Careful	92 (76.7)	47 (78.3)	45 (75.9)
Severe	14 (11.7)	13 (21.7)	1 (1.7)

n (%) or Mean ± SD.

Using t-test, χ² test.

Table 2.

Dietary habits and dietary behavior of participants

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)	P-value
Dietary habits¹⁾
Do you usually eat salty?	32.0 ± 9.6	32.5 ± 9.3	31.5 ± 10.1	0.573
Dietary behaviors
I eat all of the noodle soup liquid.²⁾	5.63 ± 2.6	5.7 ± 2.6	5.57 ± 2.6	0.783
I habitually add salt or sauce to food^.2)	6.65 ± 2.5	6.43 ± 2.6	6.87 ± 2.3	0.348
I add a lot of soy sauce or red pepper paste to sliced rat fish, Korean pancakes (Jeon), or fried food.²⁾	6.23 ± 2.5	6.00 ± 2.6	6.47 ± 2.5	0.322
I check the sodium content when I buy processed foods.²⁾⁴⁾	8.27 ± 2.5	8.53 ± 2.3	8.00 ± 2.7	0.254
I ask them to cook blandly when I eat out.²⁾⁴⁾	8.95 ± 1.7	8.83 ± 1.9	9.07 ± 1.6	0.479
How often do you eat Korean soup or stew?³⁾	5.80 ± 2.1	5.83 ± 1.9	5.77 ± 2.2	0.864
How often do you eat kimchi?³⁾	6.22 ± 2.3	6.17 ± 2.3	6.27 ± 2.4	0.819
How often do you eat salted dry fish as a side dish?³⁾	2.58 ± 1.0	2.67 ± 1.2	2.50 ± 0.8	0.401
How often do you eat nuts for a snack?³⁾⁴⁾	9.03 ± 1.6	9.00 ± 1.6	9.07 ± 1.7	0.829
How often do you eat fruits?³⁾⁴⁾	7.52 ± 2.2	7.83 ± 1.9	7.20 ± 2.3	0.118
Total	66.88 ± 9.4	67.0 ± 8.5	66.8 ± 10.2	0.893

Mean ± SD.

Using t-test.

¹⁾Unsalty: 10, slightly unsalty: 20, neither unsalty nor salty: 30, slightly salty: 40, and salty: 50.

²⁾Not at all: 2, slightly: 4, moderately: 6, very: 8, and extremely: 10.

³⁾< 3 times/month: 2, 1–2 times/week: 4, 3–6 times/week: 8, once/day: 8, and 2–3 times/day: 10.

⁴⁾Reverse-calculated.

Table 3.

Comparison of obesity indicators according to sodium index quartile

Variables	Q1 (n = 30)	Q2 (n = 30)	Q3 (n = 30)	Q4 (n = 30)	P-value
Body mass index (kg/m²)	19.59 ± 1.73^a	21.14 ± 1.54^b	22.92 ± 1.87^c	26.99 ± 3.75^d	< 0.001
Body fat percentage (%)	22.36 ± 4.48^a	23.84 ± 4.87^a	21.47 ± 6.01^a	26.92 ± 6.52^b	0.001
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.72 ± 0.03^a	0.76 ± 0.04^b	0.80 ± 0.04^c	0.85 ± 0.05^d	< 0.001
Visceral fat level	3.13 ± 1.69^a	5.00 ± 2.00^b	7.00 ± 1.69^c	9.97 ± 2.70^d	< 0.001

Mean ± SD.

Means with different lowercase letters in the same row are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

Table 4.

Comparison of sodium index according to the obesity indicators

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)
Body mass index¹⁾
Underweight	145.6 ± 21.9^a	160.6 ± 0.0	144.3 ± 22.4^a
Normal	179.5 ± 28.1^b	204.2 ± 15.8^a	164.2 ± 22.5^a^b
Overweight	205.0 ± 25.3^c	217.4 ± 17.7^b	178.5 ± 17.7^b
Obesity	246.5 ± 28.6^d	252.0 ± 25.1^c	223.4 ± 33.9^c
P-value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Body fat percentage²⁾
Moderate	158.3 ± 26.1^a	190.5 ± 17.4^a	151.9 ± 22.6^a
Overfat	197.1 ± 26.7^b	211.8 ± 18.2^b	172.5 ± 19.7^b
Obesity	239.5 ± 35.2^c	255.5 ± 22.4^c	205.5 ± 33.7^c
P-value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Mean ± SD.

Means with different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

¹⁾Body mass index: < 18.5 kg/m² underweight, 18.5–22.9 kg/m² normal, 23–24.9 kg/m² overweight, ≥ 25 kg/m² obesity.

²⁾Body fat percentage: < 8% underweight, 8% to < 15% moderate, 15% to < 25% overfat, ≥ 25% obesity for males; < 15% underweight, 15% to < 25% moderate, 25% to < 30% overfat, ≥ 30% obesity for females.

Table 5.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient between sodium index and obesity indicators

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)
Body mass index	0.821^***	0.838^***	0.781^***
Body fat percentage	0.307^**	0.800^***	0.711^***
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.823^***	0.738^***	0.696^***
Visceral fat level	0.823^***	0.767^***	0.725^***

^**P < 0.01,

^***P < 0.001 by Pearson’s correlation analysis.

Table 6.

OR for obesity according to sodium index by multiple logistic regression

Variables	Sodium index, OR (95% CI)
Variables	Moderate	Careful	Severe
Obesity based on body fat percentage
Unadjusted model	1.000	1.030 (0.924–1.149)	1.307 (1.109–1.541)^**
Adjusted model¹⁾	1.000	1.253 (1.055–1.487)	2.181 (1.526–3.118)^***
Obesity based on visceral fat level
Unadjusted model	1.000	1.797 (1.281–2.521)^**	3.819 (2.330–6.262)^***
Adjusted model¹⁾	1.000	1.468 (1.012–2.128)^*	4.073 (2.097–7.911)^***

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

¹⁾Multiple logistic regression for obesity with sodium index adjusted for age and sex.

^*P < 0.05,

^**P < 0.01,

^***P < 0.001.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight [Internet]. WHO; 2024 Mar 1 [updated 2024 Mar 1; cited 2024 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-andoverweight
2. Formica V, Morelli C, Riondino S, Renzi N, Nitti D, Di Daniele N, et al. Obesity and common pathways of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Endocr Metab Sci 2020; 1(3-4): 100065.Article
3. Kim MH, Kim MK, Choi BY, Shin YJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its association with cardiovascular diseases in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19(2): 195-201.Article PubMed PMC
4. Korac B, Kalezic A, Pekovic-Vaughan V, Korac A, Jankovic A. Redox changes in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. Redox Biol 2021; 42: 101887.Article PubMed PMC
5. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 2000; 404(6778): 635-643.Article PubMed PDF
6. Chen Q, Wang J, Yang J, Jin Z, Shi W, Qin Y, et al. Association between adult weight gain and colorectal cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cancer 2015; 136(12): 2880-2889.Article PubMed
7. Kim YJ, Yeom HE. Evaluating the predictive efficiency of obesity-related factors for type 2 diabetes: a panel study using KoGES data. J Health Inform Stat 2024; 49(1): 54-61.Article PDF
8. Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Korea health statistics 2022: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IX-1) [Internet]. KDCA; 2022 Dec 31 [updated 2022 Dec 31; cited 2024 Mar 1]. Available from: https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub04/sub04_03.do?classType=7
9. Chong MY, Han I. Distribution of the metabolic syndrome by obesity and health behavior based on the 8 KNHANES at 2019. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2022; 51(11): 1136-1147.
10. Balkau B, Deanfield JE, Després JP, Bassand JP, Fox KA, Smith SC Jr, et al. International Day for the Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA): a study of waist circumference, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus in 168,000 primary care patients in 63 countries. Circulation 2007; 116(17): 1942-1951.Article PubMed PMC
11. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363(9403): 157-163.Article PubMed
12. Escobedo-de la Peña J, Ramírez-Hernández JA, Fernández-Ramos MT, González-Figueroa E, Champagne B. Body fat percentage rather than body mass index related to the high occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Arch Med Res 2020; 51(6): 564-571.Article PubMed
13. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR); The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2020. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020.
14. Okayama A, Okuda N, Miura K, Okamura T, Hayakawa T, Akasaka H, et al. Dietary sodium-to-potassium ratio as a risk factor for stroke, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in Japan: the NIPPON DATA80 cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(7): e011632.Article PubMed PMC
15. Mente A, O’Donnell M, Rangarajan S, McQueen M, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A, et al. Urinary sodium excretion, blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: a community-level prospective epidemiological cohort study. Lancet 2018; 392(10146): 496-506.Article PubMed
16. Li Y, Huang Z, Jin C, Xing A, Liu Y, Huangfu C, et al. Longitudinal change of perceived salt intake and stroke risk in a Chinese population. Stroke 2018; 49(6): 1332-1339.Article PubMed PMC
17. Umesawa M, Iso H, Fujino Y, Kikuchi S, Tamakoshi A; JACC Study Group. Salty food preference and intake and risk of gastric cancer: the JACC study. J Epidemiol 2016; 26(2): 92-97.Article PubMed PMC
18. Larsen SC, Ängquist L, Sørensen TI, Heitmann BL. 24h urinary sodium excretion and subsequent change in weight, waist circumference and body composition. PLoS One 2013; 8(7): e69689.Article PubMed PMC
19. Song HJ, Cho YG, Lee HJ. Dietary sodium intake and prevalence of overweight in adults. Metabolism 2013; 62(5): 703-708.Article PubMed
20. Oh HW, Kim HJ, Jun DW, Lee SM. Associations between 24-hour urine sodium excretion level and obesity-related metabolic risk factors. Korean J Community Nutr 2015; 20(6): 460-467.Article
21. Ma Y, He FJ, MacGregor GA. High salt intake: independent risk factor for obesity? Hypertension 2015; 66(4): 843-849.Article PubMed
22. Navia B, Aparicio A, Perea JM, Pérez-Farinós N, Villar-Villalba C, Labrado E, et al. Sodium intake may promote weight gain; results of the FANPE study in a representative sample of the adult Spanish population. Nutr Hosp 2014; 29(6): 1283-1289.PubMed
23. Zhang X, Wang J, Li J, Yu Y, Song Y. A positive association between dietary sodium intake and obesity and central obesity: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006. Nutr Res 2018; 55: 33-44.Article PubMed
24. Yoon YS, Oh SW. Sodium density and obesity; the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67(2): 141-146.Article PubMed PDF
25. Nam GE, Kim SM, Choi MK, Heo YR, Hyun TS, Lyu ES, et al. Association between 24-h urinary sodium excretion and obesity in Korean adults: a multicenter study. Nutrition 2017; 41: 113-119.Article PubMed
26. Lee YK, Hyun T, Ro H, Heo YR, Choi MK. Development and application of the sodium index to estimate and assess sodium intake for Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2022; 16(3): 366-378.Article PubMed PMC PDF
27. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region; International Association for the Study of Obesity; International Obesity Task Force. The Asia-Pacific perspective: reducing obesity and its treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia Pty Limited; 2000
28. Lee RD, Nieman DC. Nutritional assessment. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2007. p. 201-202.
29. Korean Society for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (KSHPDP). Assessment of obesity [Internet]. KSHPDP; 2002 [cited 2024 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.healthpro.or.kr/health/viewC.php?cat=11&number=102
30. Oh SW, Han KH, Han SY, Koo HS, Kim S, Chin HJ. Association of sodium excretion with metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and body fat. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(39): e1650.Article PubMed PMC
31. Oh HY, Kim MK, Lee M, Kim YO. Macronutrient composition and sodium intake of diet are associated with risk of metabolic syndrome and hypertension in Korean women. PLoS One 2013; 8(10): e78088.Article PubMed PMC
32. Cheon SY, Wang HW, Lee HJ, Hwang KM, Yoon HS, Kang YJ. Relationship of sodium consumption with obesity in Korean adults based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010~2014. J Nutr Health 2017; 50(1): 64-73.Article PDF
33. Lee MJ, Park MY, Kim JH, Sung SY, Lee MS. Impacts of high sodium intake on obesity-related gene expression. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2018; 28(5): 364-374.Article
34. Seo MH, Kim YH, Han K, Jung JH, Park YG, Lee SS, et al. Prevalence of obesity and incidence of obesityrelated comorbidities in Koreans based on National Health Insurance Service Health Checkup Data 2006-2015. J Obes Metab Syndr 2018; 27(1): 46-52.PubMed PMC
35. Faraco G, Hochrainer K, Segarra SG, Schaeffer S, Santisteban MM, Menon A, et al. Dietary salt promotes cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation. Nature 2019; 574(7780): 686-690.Article PubMed PMC PDF

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Relationship of sodium index with the obesity indicators of university students in Daegu, South Korea: a cross-sectional study

Korean J Community Nutr. 2024;29(3):189-198. Published online June 30, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2024.29.3.189

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Related articles

Relationship of sodium index with the obesity indicators of university students in Daegu, South Korea: a cross-sectional study

Fig. 1. Comparison of obesity index according to sodium index. (A) Body mass index; (B) Body fat percentage; (C) Waist-to-hip ratio; (D) Visceral fat. Bars indicate the mean ± standard error. Means with different lower case letters in the same column are significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

Fig. 1.

Relationship of sodium index with the obesity indicators of university students in Daegu, South Korea: a cross-sectional study

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)	P-value
Age (years)	23.6 ± 2.2	24.1 ± 2.1	23.2 ± 2.2	0.026
Body mass index (kg/m²)	22.6 ± 3.3	24.1 ± 3.3	21.1 ± 3.3	< 0.001
Obesity (%)	26 (21.7)	21 (35.0)	5 (8.3)	< 0.001
Body fat percentage (%)	23.6 ± 5.8	21.8 ± 5.8	25.4 ± 5.3	0.001
Obesity (%)	28 (23.3)	19 (31.7)	9 (15.0)	< 0.001
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.79 ± 0.06	0.82 ± 0.05	0.75 ± 0.05	< 0.001
Visceral fat level	6.25 ± 3.24	7.98 ± 2.49	4.52 ± 2.97	< 0.001
Estimated sodium intake (mg/d)	3,907.1 ± 821.3	4,470.8 ± 597.8	3,343.4 ± 597.3	< 0.001
Sodium index	195.3 ± 41.0	223.5 ± 29.8	167.1 ± 29.8	< 0.001
Very moderate	1 (0.8)	0 (0.0)	1 (1.7)	< 0.001
Moderate	13 (10.8)	0 (0.0)	13 (21.7)
Careful	92 (76.7)	47 (78.3)	45 (75.9)
Severe	14 (11.7)	13 (21.7)	1 (1.7)

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)	P-value
Dietary habits¹⁾
Do you usually eat salty?	32.0 ± 9.6	32.5 ± 9.3	31.5 ± 10.1	0.573
Dietary behaviors
I eat all of the noodle soup liquid.²⁾	5.63 ± 2.6	5.7 ± 2.6	5.57 ± 2.6	0.783
I habitually add salt or sauce to food^.2)	6.65 ± 2.5	6.43 ± 2.6	6.87 ± 2.3	0.348
I add a lot of soy sauce or red pepper paste to sliced rat fish, Korean pancakes (Jeon), or fried food.²⁾	6.23 ± 2.5	6.00 ± 2.6	6.47 ± 2.5	0.322
I check the sodium content when I buy processed foods.²⁾⁴⁾	8.27 ± 2.5	8.53 ± 2.3	8.00 ± 2.7	0.254
I ask them to cook blandly when I eat out.²⁾⁴⁾	8.95 ± 1.7	8.83 ± 1.9	9.07 ± 1.6	0.479
How often do you eat Korean soup or stew?³⁾	5.80 ± 2.1	5.83 ± 1.9	5.77 ± 2.2	0.864
How often do you eat kimchi?³⁾	6.22 ± 2.3	6.17 ± 2.3	6.27 ± 2.4	0.819
How often do you eat salted dry fish as a side dish?³⁾	2.58 ± 1.0	2.67 ± 1.2	2.50 ± 0.8	0.401
How often do you eat nuts for a snack?³⁾⁴⁾	9.03 ± 1.6	9.00 ± 1.6	9.07 ± 1.7	0.829
How often do you eat fruits?³⁾⁴⁾	7.52 ± 2.2	7.83 ± 1.9	7.20 ± 2.3	0.118
Total	66.88 ± 9.4	67.0 ± 8.5	66.8 ± 10.2	0.893

Variables	Q1 (n = 30)	Q2 (n = 30)	Q3 (n = 30)	Q4 (n = 30)	P-value
Body mass index (kg/m²)	19.59 ± 1.73^a	21.14 ± 1.54^b	22.92 ± 1.87^c	26.99 ± 3.75^d	< 0.001
Body fat percentage (%)	22.36 ± 4.48^a	23.84 ± 4.87^a	21.47 ± 6.01^a	26.92 ± 6.52^b	0.001
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.72 ± 0.03^a	0.76 ± 0.04^b	0.80 ± 0.04^c	0.85 ± 0.05^d	< 0.001
Visceral fat level	3.13 ± 1.69^a	5.00 ± 2.00^b	7.00 ± 1.69^c	9.97 ± 2.70^d	< 0.001

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)
Body mass index¹⁾
Underweight	145.6 ± 21.9^a	160.6 ± 0.0	144.3 ± 22.4^a
Normal	179.5 ± 28.1^b	204.2 ± 15.8^a	164.2 ± 22.5^a^b
Overweight	205.0 ± 25.3^c	217.4 ± 17.7^b	178.5 ± 17.7^b
Obesity	246.5 ± 28.6^d	252.0 ± 25.1^c	223.4 ± 33.9^c
P-value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Body fat percentage²⁾
Moderate	158.3 ± 26.1^a	190.5 ± 17.4^a	151.9 ± 22.6^a
Overfat	197.1 ± 26.7^b	211.8 ± 18.2^b	172.5 ± 19.7^b
Obesity	239.5 ± 35.2^c	255.5 ± 22.4^c	205.5 ± 33.7^c
P-value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Variables	Total (n = 120)	Men (n = 60)	Women (n = 60)
Body mass index	0.821^***	0.838^***	0.781^***
Body fat percentage	0.307^**	0.800^***	0.711^***
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.823^***	0.738^***	0.696^***
Visceral fat level	0.823^***	0.767^***	0.725^***

Variables	Sodium index, OR (95% CI)
Variables	Moderate	Careful	Severe
Obesity based on body fat percentage
Unadjusted model	1.000	1.030 (0.924–1.149)	1.307 (1.109–1.541)^**
Adjusted model¹⁾	1.000	1.253 (1.055–1.487)	2.181 (1.526–3.118)^***
Obesity based on visceral fat level
Unadjusted model	1.000	1.797 (1.281–2.521)^**	3.819 (2.330–6.262)^***
Adjusted model¹⁾	1.000	1.468 (1.012–2.128)^*	4.073 (2.097–7.911)^***

Table 1. Obesity indicators and sodium index of participants

n (%) or Mean ± SD.

Using t-test, χ² test.

Table 2. Dietary habits and dietary behavior of participants

Mean ± SD.

Using t-test.

Unsalty: 10, slightly unsalty: 20, neither unsalty nor salty: 30, slightly salty: 40, and salty: 50.

Not at all: 2, slightly: 4, moderately: 6, very: 8, and extremely: 10.

< 3 times/month: 2, 1–2 times/week: 4, 3–6 times/week: 8, once/day: 8, and 2–3 times/day: 10.

Reverse-calculated.

Table 3. Comparison of obesity indicators according to sodium index quartile

Mean ± SD.

Means with different lowercase letters in the same row are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

Table 4. Comparison of sodium index according to the obesity indicators

Mean ± SD.

Means with different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test with a P-value of < 0.05.

Body mass index: < 18.5 kg/m² underweight, 18.5–22.9 kg/m² normal, 23–24.9 kg/m² overweight, ≥ 25 kg/m² obesity.

Body fat percentage: < 8% underweight, 8% to < 15% moderate, 15% to < 25% overfat, ≥ 25% obesity for males; < 15% underweight, 15% to < 25% moderate, 25% to < 30% overfat, ≥ 30% obesity for females.

Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between sodium index and obesity indicators

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001 by Pearson’s correlation analysis.

Table 6. OR for obesity according to sodium index by multiple logistic regression

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Multiple logistic regression for obesity with sodium index adjusted for age and sex.