Institute of Symbiotic Life-TECH, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
1Deptartment of Food and Nutrition, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
3Deptartment of Food and Nutrition, Hanyang Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
4Nutrition and Functional Food Research, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongwon, Korea.
5Department of Food and Nutrition, Sangji University, Wonju, Korea.
Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1) N (%), 2) χ2-value, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) The multiple responses
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%)
2) For respondents that say yes to the above question
3) The multiple responses
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD
2) Total (max. 100) = Nutrition (max. 50) + Food (max. 50) Valuation criteria: less than score 49 = need to more improve, score 50 - 74 = need to improve, more than score 75 = great
*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD
2) Total (max. 100) = Nutrition (max. 50) + Food (max. 50) Valuation criteria: less than score 49 = need to more improve, score 50 - 74 = need to improve, more than score 75 = great
***: p < 0.001
1) N (%), 2) χ2-value, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) The multiple responses *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Frequency (%) 2) For respondents that say yes to the above question 3) The multiple responses *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD 2) Total (max. 100) = Nutrition (max. 50) + Food (max. 50) Valuation criteria: less than score 49 = need to more improve, score 50 - 74 = need to improve, more than score 75 = great *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD 2) Total (max. 100) = Nutrition (max. 50) + Food (max. 50) Valuation criteria: less than score 49 = need to more improve, score 50 - 74 = need to improve, more than score 75 = great ***: p < 0.001